A Win-Win Local Energy Market for Participants, Retailers, and the Network Operator : A Peer-to-Peer Trading-driven Case Study

Liaqat Ali, M. I. Azim, Jan Peters, V. Bhandari, Anand Menon, Vinod Tiwari, Jemma Green
{"title":"A Win-Win Local Energy Market for Participants, Retailers, and the Network Operator : A Peer-to-Peer Trading-driven Case Study","authors":"Liaqat Ali, M. I. Azim, Jan Peters, V. Bhandari, Anand Menon, Vinod Tiwari, Jemma Green","doi":"10.1109/INDIN51773.2022.9976167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What are the outcomes of using a local energy market (LEM) to trade electricity between participants, retailers/suppliers and the network operator? Such a question is becoming increasingly important for electrical grids as more and more solar photovoltaics (PVs) and battery energy storage systems (BESS) are introduced. This paper presents the formulation and economic analysis of a peer-to-peer (P2P)-driven LEM to determine its suitability for each of the players in the market. To do so, a framework is proposed to define the objective function of the LEM while the financial and network parameters are considered. Then, the designed model is deployed on an actual Australian suburb containing 300 participants — 200 consumers, 50 prosumers with solar PVs, and 50 prosumers with solar PVs and BESSs. This research examines the case of two retailers/suppliers and the network operator to evaluate the financial gains which are compared to the business-as-usual (BAU), where consumers buy electricity from the grid while prosumers sell excess energy back to the grid, via feed-in-tariff (FiT) mechanism. The simulation results emphasise that with a LEM: 1) all participants save money, with prosumers owning solar PVs and BESSs gaining the most; 2) the income margin of the retailer with only consumers remains unaffected, but it is slightly increased for other retailer with prosumers; and 3) the network operator sees a slight increase in its income and grid congestion will reduce.","PeriodicalId":359190,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 20th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 20th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN51773.2022.9976167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

What are the outcomes of using a local energy market (LEM) to trade electricity between participants, retailers/suppliers and the network operator? Such a question is becoming increasingly important for electrical grids as more and more solar photovoltaics (PVs) and battery energy storage systems (BESS) are introduced. This paper presents the formulation and economic analysis of a peer-to-peer (P2P)-driven LEM to determine its suitability for each of the players in the market. To do so, a framework is proposed to define the objective function of the LEM while the financial and network parameters are considered. Then, the designed model is deployed on an actual Australian suburb containing 300 participants — 200 consumers, 50 prosumers with solar PVs, and 50 prosumers with solar PVs and BESSs. This research examines the case of two retailers/suppliers and the network operator to evaluate the financial gains which are compared to the business-as-usual (BAU), where consumers buy electricity from the grid while prosumers sell excess energy back to the grid, via feed-in-tariff (FiT) mechanism. The simulation results emphasise that with a LEM: 1) all participants save money, with prosumers owning solar PVs and BESSs gaining the most; 2) the income margin of the retailer with only consumers remains unaffected, but it is slightly increased for other retailer with prosumers; and 3) the network operator sees a slight increase in its income and grid congestion will reduce.
参与者、零售商和网络运营商的双赢本地能源市场:点对点交易驱动的案例研究
使用本地能源市场(LEM)在参与者、零售商/供应商和网络运营商之间进行电力交易的结果是什么?随着越来越多的太阳能光伏(pv)和电池储能系统(BESS)的引入,这一问题对电网来说变得越来越重要。本文提出了一个点对点(P2P)驱动的LEM的公式和经济分析,以确定它对市场中每个参与者的适用性。为此,提出了一个框架来定义LEM的目标函数,同时考虑了财务和网络参数。然后,设计的模型被部署在一个实际的澳大利亚郊区,包含300个参与者——200个消费者,50个拥有太阳能光伏的产消者,50个拥有太阳能光伏和bess的产消者。本研究考察了两家零售商/供应商和网络运营商的案例,以评估与商业惯例(BAU)相比的财务收益,其中消费者从电网购买电力,而产消者通过上网电价(FiT)机制将多余的能源出售给电网。模拟结果强调,在LEM中:1)所有参与者都节省了资金,其中产消者拥有太阳能光伏,bess获得最多;2)只有消费者的零售商的利润率不受影响,而其他有生产消费者的零售商的利润率略有增加;3)网络运营商的收入略有增加,电网拥堵将会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信