The Cultural Politics of Hunting: Sporting Estates and Recreational Land Use in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland

A. Wightman, P. Higgins, G. Jarvie, R. Nicol
{"title":"The Cultural Politics of Hunting: Sporting Estates and Recreational Land Use in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland","authors":"A. Wightman, P. Higgins, G. Jarvie, R. Nicol","doi":"10.1080/713999852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sporting estates are a form of private hunting reserve covering extensive areas of the Highlands and Islands of Scotland and have been the focus of debate regarding their legitimacy from moral, political, economic and social perspectives ever since their establishment in the nineteenth century. In recent years, a growing debate about sustainable land use, access to the countryside, ‘blood sports’ and land reform has led to sporting estates being subjected to a continuing critique from environmentalists, land reformers, crofting tenants, community interests and politicians. The sporting estate is thought to be unique in modern industrial democracies and, as the legal, political and social framework which governs much of the hunting economy, perhaps has its closest parallels with the private game reserves of some African states. Certainly, in comparison to other European countries, where they do not exist, sporting estates are a distinctively Scottish phenomenon. Owners and managers of sporting estates are increasingly finding themselves drawn into a debate about the role and validity of such estates. The re-establishment of a Scottish Parliament in 1999 led to the emergence of new public policy agendas on rural development and land reform, topics which were neglected at the UK level owing to a shortage of parliamentary time and the vested interests of the many landowning members of the House of Lords. This article offers an analysis of the role of sporting estates in recreational land use. Is hunting a form of recreation and, if so, what is the relationship between hunting and sporting estates? For the purposes of this analysis, the article concentrates on evidence derived from deerstalking, which represents the most widespread and historically dominant form of hunting, the one with the closest association with the sporting estate phenomenon, and the one which has been subjected to most (albeit still limited) research and analysis. Importantly, the article does not concern itself with the question of the legitimacy or otherwise of hunting as an activity. Its purpose is to examine the influence which the sporting estate as 51css04.qxd 22/03/2002 12:25 Page 53","PeriodicalId":105095,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Sport, Society","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Sport, Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/713999852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Sporting estates are a form of private hunting reserve covering extensive areas of the Highlands and Islands of Scotland and have been the focus of debate regarding their legitimacy from moral, political, economic and social perspectives ever since their establishment in the nineteenth century. In recent years, a growing debate about sustainable land use, access to the countryside, ‘blood sports’ and land reform has led to sporting estates being subjected to a continuing critique from environmentalists, land reformers, crofting tenants, community interests and politicians. The sporting estate is thought to be unique in modern industrial democracies and, as the legal, political and social framework which governs much of the hunting economy, perhaps has its closest parallels with the private game reserves of some African states. Certainly, in comparison to other European countries, where they do not exist, sporting estates are a distinctively Scottish phenomenon. Owners and managers of sporting estates are increasingly finding themselves drawn into a debate about the role and validity of such estates. The re-establishment of a Scottish Parliament in 1999 led to the emergence of new public policy agendas on rural development and land reform, topics which were neglected at the UK level owing to a shortage of parliamentary time and the vested interests of the many landowning members of the House of Lords. This article offers an analysis of the role of sporting estates in recreational land use. Is hunting a form of recreation and, if so, what is the relationship between hunting and sporting estates? For the purposes of this analysis, the article concentrates on evidence derived from deerstalking, which represents the most widespread and historically dominant form of hunting, the one with the closest association with the sporting estate phenomenon, and the one which has been subjected to most (albeit still limited) research and analysis. Importantly, the article does not concern itself with the question of the legitimacy or otherwise of hunting as an activity. Its purpose is to examine the influence which the sporting estate as 51css04.qxd 22/03/2002 12:25 Page 53
狩猎的文化政治:苏格兰高地和岛屿上的运动地产和娱乐用地
体育庄园是一种私人狩猎保护区,覆盖了苏格兰高地和岛屿的广大地区,自19世纪建立以来,一直是关于其合法性的辩论焦点,从道德、政治、经济和社会的角度来看。近年来,关于可持续土地利用、进入农村、“血腥运动”和土地改革的争论越来越多,导致体育庄园受到环保主义者、土地改革者、佃农、社区利益和政治家的持续批评。体育地产被认为是现代工业民主国家中独一无二的,作为法律、政治和社会框架,它管理着大部分狩猎经济,也许与一些非洲国家的私人狩猎保护区最相似。当然,与其他不存在体育地产的欧洲国家相比,体育地产是苏格兰特有的现象。体育地产的所有者和管理者越来越多地发现自己卷入了一场关于这些地产的作用和有效性的辩论。1999年苏格兰议会的重建导致了农村发展和土地改革的新公共政策议程的出现,由于议会时间短缺和上议院许多拥有土地的成员的既得利益,这些议题在英国被忽视了。本文分析了体育地产在康乐用地中的作用。狩猎是一种娱乐形式吗?如果是,狩猎和体育地产之间的关系是什么?为了进行分析,本文将重点放在从猎鹿中获得的证据上,猎鹿是历史上最广泛、最主要的狩猎形式,与体育地产现象联系最密切,也是大多数(尽管仍然有限)研究和分析的对象。重要的是,该条并不涉及狩猎作为一种活动的合法性或其他问题。其目的是考察体育产业的影响。qxd 22/03/2002 12:25页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信