6 The Supreme Court and the Constitution

Dickson Brice
{"title":"6 The Supreme Court and the Constitution","authors":"Dickson Brice","doi":"10.1093/LAW/9780198793731.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses first on the power of the President of Ireland to refer draft Bills to the Supreme Court for review under Article 26 of the Constitution. It analyses the most recent instances of this practice and queries whether the ‘one judgment’ rule and the ‘immutability’ rule (whereby a decision that a Bill is constitutional can never again be challenged in court) are necessary or desirable. The chapter then looks at how the Supreme Court has—or has not—extended the reach of constitutionalism into the realm of socio-economic rights, in particular in situations where the expenditure of public money is a key issue. This moves into a section on unenumerated rights and the natural law theory of rights. The chapter acknowledges that significant steps have been taken by the Supreme Court to develop the 1937 Constitution but suggests that significant opportunities to do more have been missed.","PeriodicalId":251482,"journal":{"name":"The Irish Supreme Court","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Irish Supreme Court","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/LAW/9780198793731.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter focuses first on the power of the President of Ireland to refer draft Bills to the Supreme Court for review under Article 26 of the Constitution. It analyses the most recent instances of this practice and queries whether the ‘one judgment’ rule and the ‘immutability’ rule (whereby a decision that a Bill is constitutional can never again be challenged in court) are necessary or desirable. The chapter then looks at how the Supreme Court has—or has not—extended the reach of constitutionalism into the realm of socio-economic rights, in particular in situations where the expenditure of public money is a key issue. This moves into a section on unenumerated rights and the natural law theory of rights. The chapter acknowledges that significant steps have been taken by the Supreme Court to develop the 1937 Constitution but suggests that significant opportunities to do more have been missed.
最高法院与宪法
本章首先着重讨论爱尔兰总统根据《宪法》第26条将法案草案提交最高法院审查的权力。它分析了这种做法的最新实例,并质疑“一次判决”规则和“不变性”规则(即法案符合宪法的决定不能再在法庭上受到质疑)是否必要或可取。然后,本章探讨了最高法院是如何将宪政的范围扩展到社会经济权利领域的,特别是在公共资金支出是关键问题的情况下。接下来是关于未列举权利和自然法权利理论的一节。这一章承认,最高法院在制定1937年宪法方面已经采取了重要步骤,但同时也指出,错过了做更多事情的重要机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信