CEEM: A Practical Methodology for Cloud Services Evaluation

Zheng Li, L. O'Brien, He Zhang
{"title":"CEEM: A Practical Methodology for Cloud Services Evaluation","authors":"Zheng Li, L. O'Brien, He Zhang","doi":"10.1109/SERVICES.2013.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given an increasing number of Cloud services available in the market, evaluating candidate Cloud services is crucial and beneficial for both service customers (e.g. cost benefit analysis) and providers (e.g. direction of improvement). When it comes to performing any evaluation, a suitable methodology is inevitably required to direct experimental implementations. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of a sound methodology to guide the evaluation of Cloud services. By borrowing the lessons from evaluation of traditional computing systems, referring to the guidelines for Design of Experiments (DOE), and summarizing the existing experiences of real experimental studies, we proposed a generic Cloud Evaluation Experiment Methodology (CEEM) for Cloud services evaluation. Furthermore, we have established a pre-experimental knowledge base and specified corresponding suggestions to make this methodology more practical in the Cloud Computing domain. Through evaluating the Google AppEngine Python runtime as a preliminary validation, we show that Cloud evaluators may achieve more rational and convincing experimental results and conclusions following such an evaluation methodology.","PeriodicalId":169370,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Ninth World Congress on Services","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Ninth World Congress on Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERVICES.2013.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Given an increasing number of Cloud services available in the market, evaluating candidate Cloud services is crucial and beneficial for both service customers (e.g. cost benefit analysis) and providers (e.g. direction of improvement). When it comes to performing any evaluation, a suitable methodology is inevitably required to direct experimental implementations. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of a sound methodology to guide the evaluation of Cloud services. By borrowing the lessons from evaluation of traditional computing systems, referring to the guidelines for Design of Experiments (DOE), and summarizing the existing experiences of real experimental studies, we proposed a generic Cloud Evaluation Experiment Methodology (CEEM) for Cloud services evaluation. Furthermore, we have established a pre-experimental knowledge base and specified corresponding suggestions to make this methodology more practical in the Cloud Computing domain. Through evaluating the Google AppEngine Python runtime as a preliminary validation, we show that Cloud evaluators may achieve more rational and convincing experimental results and conclusions following such an evaluation methodology.
CEEM:云服务评估的实用方法
鉴于市场上可用的云服务越来越多,评估备选云服务对于服务客户(例如成本效益分析)和提供商(例如改进方向)都是至关重要和有益的。当涉及到执行任何评估时,不可避免地需要一种合适的方法来指导实验实现。然而,仍然缺乏一种可靠的方法来指导对云服务的评估。借鉴传统计算系统评估的经验教训,参考实验设计指南(DOE),总结已有的真实实验研究经验,提出了一种通用的云服务评估实验方法(CEEM)。此外,我们还建立了一个预实验知识库,并提出了相应的建议,使该方法在云计算领域更加实用。通过对Google AppEngine Python运行时的评估作为初步验证,我们表明,采用这种评估方法,云评估人员可能会获得更合理、更有说服力的实验结果和结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信