Improved Portfolio Choice Using Second Order Stochastic Dominance

James E. Hodder, J. Jackwerth, O. Kolokolova
{"title":"Improved Portfolio Choice Using Second Order Stochastic Dominance","authors":"James E. Hodder, J. Jackwerth, O. Kolokolova","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1419926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constructing portfolios based on second-order stochastic dominance (SSD) is theoretically attractive since all risk-averse investors would prefer a dominating portfolio. However, choosing among SSD efficient portfolios is a challenge without an obvious ranking metric. We explore a particular choice based on Kuosmanen (2004) and compare its performance to other SSD-related strategies and to standard portfolio choice approaches. The SSD-related choices (including the Kuosmanen approach) outperform portfolios based on the Sharpe ratio, equal weights, and the information ratio. Portfolios based on minimum variance that also match the benchmark’s mean return perform on a par with the SSD-related choices.","PeriodicalId":175023,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Intertemporal Consumer Choice; Life Cycle Models & Savings (Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Intertemporal Consumer Choice; Life Cycle Models & Savings (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1419926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

Constructing portfolios based on second-order stochastic dominance (SSD) is theoretically attractive since all risk-averse investors would prefer a dominating portfolio. However, choosing among SSD efficient portfolios is a challenge without an obvious ranking metric. We explore a particular choice based on Kuosmanen (2004) and compare its performance to other SSD-related strategies and to standard portfolio choice approaches. The SSD-related choices (including the Kuosmanen approach) outperform portfolios based on the Sharpe ratio, equal weights, and the information ratio. Portfolios based on minimum variance that also match the benchmark’s mean return perform on a par with the SSD-related choices.
基于二阶随机优势的改进投资组合选择
构建基于二阶随机优势(SSD)的投资组合在理论上是有吸引力的,因为所有厌恶风险的投资者都更喜欢主导投资组合。然而,如果没有明显的排名指标,在SSD高效组合中进行选择是一项挑战。我们研究了基于Kuosmanen(2004)的一种特殊选择,并将其与其他ssd相关策略和标准投资组合选择方法的表现进行了比较。与ssd相关的选择(包括Kuosmanen方法)基于夏普比率、等权重和信息比率,优于投资组合。基于最小方差的投资组合也与基准的平均回报相匹配,其表现与ssd相关的选择相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信