On an Extension of Stein's Lemma: A Refutation

Moawia Alghalith
{"title":"On an Extension of Stein's Lemma: A Refutation","authors":"Moawia Alghalith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3653224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We prove that the assertion of Genest (2020) is incorrect and irrelevant. First, there is no claim (in the paper he is referring to) regarding the dependence of the non-arbitrary constant. That paper did not make any claim that would justify the emergence of Genest (2020). Furthermore, these are ”linearized functions” based on convergence as n → ∞. Moreover, though it becomes irrelevant and needless given the above discussion, the author still made incorrect claims and we provide refuting examples.","PeriodicalId":257462,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Philosophy of Mathematics & Logic (Topic)","volume":"433 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Philosophy of Mathematics & Logic (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3653224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We prove that the assertion of Genest (2020) is incorrect and irrelevant. First, there is no claim (in the paper he is referring to) regarding the dependence of the non-arbitrary constant. That paper did not make any claim that would justify the emergence of Genest (2020). Furthermore, these are ”linearized functions” based on convergence as n → ∞. Moreover, though it becomes irrelevant and needless given the above discussion, the author still made incorrect claims and we provide refuting examples.
我们证明Genest(2020)的断言是不正确和不相关的。首先,(在他所引用的论文中)没有关于非任意常数的依赖性的声明。那篇论文没有提出任何主张来证明Genest(2020)的出现是合理的。此外,这些是基于n→∞收敛的“线性化函数”。此外,尽管上述讨论变得无关紧要和不必要,但作者仍然提出了错误的主张,我们提供了反驳的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信