Jade Housewirth, D. Duckworth, Conrrado Jimenez, Britney Payne, Yuliana Sanchez-Luna, S. Malasri
{"title":"Optimum Corner Offset for Cubical Corrugated Boxes","authors":"Jade Housewirth, D. Duckworth, Conrrado Jimenez, Britney Payne, Yuliana Sanchez-Luna, S. Malasri","doi":"10.23953/904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several C-flute single-wall regular slotted cubical corrugated boxes with dimensions from 12X12X12 to 22X22X22 were modified at the four corners with corner offsets from 1 inch to 8 inches to form diagonal (or “two-angle”) corners. They were conditioned at the standard test condition of 73 F and 50% RH. The optimum corner offset varied from 22% of box dimension to 26% with an average of 24%. The maximum compression strength increased from the regular corner configuration from 23% to 62%, with an average of 44%. In addition, an average of 14% saving on material at optimum corner offset.","PeriodicalId":142489,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Packaging Technology","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Packaging Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23953/904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Several C-flute single-wall regular slotted cubical corrugated boxes with dimensions from 12X12X12 to 22X22X22 were modified at the four corners with corner offsets from 1 inch to 8 inches to form diagonal (or “two-angle”) corners. They were conditioned at the standard test condition of 73 F and 50% RH. The optimum corner offset varied from 22% of box dimension to 26% with an average of 24%. The maximum compression strength increased from the regular corner configuration from 23% to 62%, with an average of 44%. In addition, an average of 14% saving on material at optimum corner offset.