Penggunaan Kontrasepsi terhadap Gangguan Siklus Menstruasi di BPM A

Anastasia Anugrah Susilaningrum, Uci Ciptiasrini, Madinah Munawaroh
{"title":"Penggunaan Kontrasepsi terhadap Gangguan Siklus Menstruasi di BPM A","authors":"Anastasia Anugrah Susilaningrum, Uci Ciptiasrini, Madinah Munawaroh","doi":"10.53801/jipki.v1i02.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Indonesia, with a very large population, is committed to implementing the Planning Family and Birth Control as a means of fulfilling international demands in improving the lives of mothers and children. One of the problems with the family planning program is menstrual disorders due to the use of hormonal contraceptives such as a one-month injection and three months of injection contraception, which often become complaints from family planning acceptors.\nObjectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in the shortest and longest cycle length between the two types of hormonal injection contraception.\nMethod: This research is a cross-sectional study conducted at the Midwife Practice Anastasia Ningrum with samples in the form of hormonal injection family planning acceptors from January 2020 to June 2020 with a sampling technique in the form of accidental sampling. The inclusion criteria in this study were active injection family planning acceptors and had an FP control card with the exclusion criteria in the form of injection contraceptive use ≤ 6 months. The independent variable in this study was the use of 1 month and three months of injection contraceptive, while the dependent variable was the shortest and longest menstrual cycle length.\nResult: The results of this study involved 70 respondents with the shortest cycle length for injection contraception of 1 month and three months, respectively 28 (21 - 40) days and 60 (28 - 90) days, as well as the longest cycle lengths for injection contraception of 1 month and three months respectively. count is 35 (28 - 90) days and 90 (40 - 90) days. The mean difference between groups using the Mann Whitney test was significant for both the longest cycle and the shortest cycle (p-value <0.05).\nConclusion: There was a significant difference between the longest and the shortest cycle length between 1 month and three months of injection contraceptive use.","PeriodicalId":308484,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Interprofesi Kesehatan Indonesia","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Interprofesi Kesehatan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53801/jipki.v1i02.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Indonesia, with a very large population, is committed to implementing the Planning Family and Birth Control as a means of fulfilling international demands in improving the lives of mothers and children. One of the problems with the family planning program is menstrual disorders due to the use of hormonal contraceptives such as a one-month injection and three months of injection contraception, which often become complaints from family planning acceptors. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in the shortest and longest cycle length between the two types of hormonal injection contraception. Method: This research is a cross-sectional study conducted at the Midwife Practice Anastasia Ningrum with samples in the form of hormonal injection family planning acceptors from January 2020 to June 2020 with a sampling technique in the form of accidental sampling. The inclusion criteria in this study were active injection family planning acceptors and had an FP control card with the exclusion criteria in the form of injection contraceptive use ≤ 6 months. The independent variable in this study was the use of 1 month and three months of injection contraceptive, while the dependent variable was the shortest and longest menstrual cycle length. Result: The results of this study involved 70 respondents with the shortest cycle length for injection contraception of 1 month and three months, respectively 28 (21 - 40) days and 60 (28 - 90) days, as well as the longest cycle lengths for injection contraception of 1 month and three months respectively. count is 35 (28 - 90) days and 90 (40 - 90) days. The mean difference between groups using the Mann Whitney test was significant for both the longest cycle and the shortest cycle (p-value <0.05). Conclusion: There was a significant difference between the longest and the shortest cycle length between 1 month and three months of injection contraceptive use.
预防月经周期中断的避孕措施
导言:印度尼西亚人口众多,致力于实施计划生育和控制生育,作为满足改善母亲和儿童生活的国际要求的一种手段。计划生育项目的一个问题是,由于使用激素避孕药,如注射一个月和三个月的注射避孕药,导致月经紊乱,这经常成为计划生育接受者的抱怨。目的:本研究的目的是确定两种激素注射避孕的最短和最长周期长度的差异。方法:本研究采用随机抽样的抽样技术,于2020年1月至2020年6月在阿纳斯塔西娅·宁格姆助产士诊所以激素注射计划生育受者的形式进行横断面研究。本研究的纳入标准为主动注射计划生育接受者,并有FP控制卡,排除标准为注射避孕使用≤6个月。本研究的自变量是使用1个月和3个月的注射避孕药,因变量是最短和最长的月经周期长度。结果:本研究共纳入70例患者,注射避孕周期最短的分别为1个月和3个月,分别为28(21 ~ 40)天和60(28 ~ 90)天,注射避孕周期最长的分别为1个月和3个月。计数为35(28 - 90)天和90(40 - 90)天。Mann Whitney检验组间最长周期和最短周期的平均差异均有统计学意义(p值<0.05)。结论:注射避孕药使用1个月与3个月的最长周期长度与最短周期长度有显著性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信