The phonetics of phonological speech errors: An acoustic analysis of slips of the tongue

S. Frisch, Richard A. Wright
{"title":"The phonetics of phonological speech errors: An acoustic analysis of slips of the tongue","authors":"S. Frisch, Richard A. Wright","doi":"10.1006/jpho.2002.0176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Acoustic analysis was used to examine whether speech errors involve lexical, segmental, or sub-featural errors in speech production. Nine participants produced tongue twisters that induced errors between /s/ and /z/ word onsets in contexts where the error outcomes were either words (e.g., sit to zit) or nonwords (e.g.,suck to *zuck). Three measurements of the /s/-/z/ contrast were made: (1) percent voicing, (2) duration of frication, and (3) amplitude of frication. The tokens were also transcribed under careful listening conditions. Gradient and categorical errors were found for all acoustic dimensions. The errors might or might not be detected by careful listening, depending on the extent to which there were errors along all three dimensions. These data support previous articulatory studies that found speech errors at a sub-featural level. However, cases where /s/ and /z/ are realized with a categorical change in voicing are more common than would be expected if categorical changes in voicing were merely extreme examples of gradient voicing errors. Also, both gradient and categorical error rates were higher when the error outcomes were words. Thus, our study also provides evidence for the psychological reality of phonological segments and words as units in the speech production process.","PeriodicalId":223246,"journal":{"name":"J. Phonetics","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"148","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2002.0176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 148

Abstract

Abstract Acoustic analysis was used to examine whether speech errors involve lexical, segmental, or sub-featural errors in speech production. Nine participants produced tongue twisters that induced errors between /s/ and /z/ word onsets in contexts where the error outcomes were either words (e.g., sit to zit) or nonwords (e.g.,suck to *zuck). Three measurements of the /s/-/z/ contrast were made: (1) percent voicing, (2) duration of frication, and (3) amplitude of frication. The tokens were also transcribed under careful listening conditions. Gradient and categorical errors were found for all acoustic dimensions. The errors might or might not be detected by careful listening, depending on the extent to which there were errors along all three dimensions. These data support previous articulatory studies that found speech errors at a sub-featural level. However, cases where /s/ and /z/ are realized with a categorical change in voicing are more common than would be expected if categorical changes in voicing were merely extreme examples of gradient voicing errors. Also, both gradient and categorical error rates were higher when the error outcomes were words. Thus, our study also provides evidence for the psychological reality of phonological segments and words as units in the speech production process.
语音错误的语音学:对口误的声学分析
摘要:声学分析用于检查语音错误是否涉及语音生成中的词法、音段或亚特征错误。九名参与者用绕口令在单词/s/和/z/之间产生错误,而错误的结果要么是单词(例如,sit to zit),要么是非单词(例如,suck to *zuck)。对/s/-/z/对比度进行了三种测量:(1)发声百分比,(2)摩擦持续时间,(3)摩擦幅度。这些标记也是在仔细聆听的条件下转录的。在所有声学维度上都发现了梯度和分类误差。通过仔细聆听,可能会或可能不会检测到错误,这取决于在所有三个维度上都存在错误的程度。这些数据支持了先前的发音研究,即在亚特征水平上发现了语音错误。然而,当/s/和/z/通过发声的绝对变化来实现时,如果发声的绝对变化仅仅是梯度发声错误的极端例子,那么这种情况就会比预期的更常见。此外,当错误结果是单词时,梯度错误率和分类错误率都更高。因此,我们的研究也为语音产生过程中音段和词作为单位的心理现实提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书