{"title":"The phonetics of phonological speech errors: An acoustic analysis of slips of the tongue","authors":"S. Frisch, Richard A. Wright","doi":"10.1006/jpho.2002.0176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Acoustic analysis was used to examine whether speech errors involve lexical, segmental, or sub-featural errors in speech production. Nine participants produced tongue twisters that induced errors between /s/ and /z/ word onsets in contexts where the error outcomes were either words (e.g., sit to zit) or nonwords (e.g.,suck to *zuck). Three measurements of the /s/-/z/ contrast were made: (1) percent voicing, (2) duration of frication, and (3) amplitude of frication. The tokens were also transcribed under careful listening conditions. Gradient and categorical errors were found for all acoustic dimensions. The errors might or might not be detected by careful listening, depending on the extent to which there were errors along all three dimensions. These data support previous articulatory studies that found speech errors at a sub-featural level. However, cases where /s/ and /z/ are realized with a categorical change in voicing are more common than would be expected if categorical changes in voicing were merely extreme examples of gradient voicing errors. Also, both gradient and categorical error rates were higher when the error outcomes were words. Thus, our study also provides evidence for the psychological reality of phonological segments and words as units in the speech production process.","PeriodicalId":223246,"journal":{"name":"J. Phonetics","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"148","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2002.0176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 148
Abstract
Abstract Acoustic analysis was used to examine whether speech errors involve lexical, segmental, or sub-featural errors in speech production. Nine participants produced tongue twisters that induced errors between /s/ and /z/ word onsets in contexts where the error outcomes were either words (e.g., sit to zit) or nonwords (e.g.,suck to *zuck). Three measurements of the /s/-/z/ contrast were made: (1) percent voicing, (2) duration of frication, and (3) amplitude of frication. The tokens were also transcribed under careful listening conditions. Gradient and categorical errors were found for all acoustic dimensions. The errors might or might not be detected by careful listening, depending on the extent to which there were errors along all three dimensions. These data support previous articulatory studies that found speech errors at a sub-featural level. However, cases where /s/ and /z/ are realized with a categorical change in voicing are more common than would be expected if categorical changes in voicing were merely extreme examples of gradient voicing errors. Also, both gradient and categorical error rates were higher when the error outcomes were words. Thus, our study also provides evidence for the psychological reality of phonological segments and words as units in the speech production process.
摘要:声学分析用于检查语音错误是否涉及语音生成中的词法、音段或亚特征错误。九名参与者用绕口令在单词/s/和/z/之间产生错误,而错误的结果要么是单词(例如,sit to zit),要么是非单词(例如,suck to *zuck)。对/s/-/z/对比度进行了三种测量:(1)发声百分比,(2)摩擦持续时间,(3)摩擦幅度。这些标记也是在仔细聆听的条件下转录的。在所有声学维度上都发现了梯度和分类误差。通过仔细聆听,可能会或可能不会检测到错误,这取决于在所有三个维度上都存在错误的程度。这些数据支持了先前的发音研究,即在亚特征水平上发现了语音错误。然而,当/s/和/z/通过发声的绝对变化来实现时,如果发声的绝对变化仅仅是梯度发声错误的极端例子,那么这种情况就会比预期的更常见。此外,当错误结果是单词时,梯度错误率和分类错误率都更高。因此,我们的研究也为语音产生过程中音段和词作为单位的心理现实提供了证据。