Leveraging machine learning approaches to estimate the impact of thermostat setpoints on individual household gas consumption

Jueming Liu, R. V. D. Vlist, Ellissa Verseput
{"title":"Leveraging machine learning approaches to estimate the impact of thermostat setpoints on individual household gas consumption","authors":"Jueming Liu, R. V. D. Vlist, Ellissa Verseput","doi":"10.1109/ICIT46573.2021.9453677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the world’s current climate change challenge and residential gas consumption being a major end-use of energy, people more than ever need to minimize their household’s energy footprint. Personalised, actionable advice can give people tips on which actions they can take to reduce residential energy usage, such as lowering the thermostat temperature. For this advice to be relevant it is important to understand the quantitative impact of thermostat setpoints on daily gas usage for each individual household. In this article, this impact is estimated by comparing three machine learning approaches.Linear regression, deep learning and gradient boosting machine are applied to a multi-dimensional time series dataset for 300 Dutch households. The three approaches are compared based on three metrics: root mean square error (RMSE), explainability and scalability. The results of the best model (gradient boosting machine) are explained using a technique called SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). This interpretation method can quantify the contribution of all inputs, among which thermostat setpoints, to the daily gas usage prediction of the model for different individual households.This article adds to the current state of the art by focusing on the impact of influenceable thermostat setpoints, as opposed to less actionable factors such as house size, insulation status of the house and weather. By applying SHAP, the personal impact and differences between individual households are estimated, in contrast to only learning trends. Moreover, a machine learning model, trained on a representative dataset, is applicable at scale to other households for estimating a personal, quantified impact of setpoint choices.","PeriodicalId":193338,"journal":{"name":"2021 22nd IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 22nd IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT46573.2021.9453677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the world’s current climate change challenge and residential gas consumption being a major end-use of energy, people more than ever need to minimize their household’s energy footprint. Personalised, actionable advice can give people tips on which actions they can take to reduce residential energy usage, such as lowering the thermostat temperature. For this advice to be relevant it is important to understand the quantitative impact of thermostat setpoints on daily gas usage for each individual household. In this article, this impact is estimated by comparing three machine learning approaches.Linear regression, deep learning and gradient boosting machine are applied to a multi-dimensional time series dataset for 300 Dutch households. The three approaches are compared based on three metrics: root mean square error (RMSE), explainability and scalability. The results of the best model (gradient boosting machine) are explained using a technique called SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). This interpretation method can quantify the contribution of all inputs, among which thermostat setpoints, to the daily gas usage prediction of the model for different individual households.This article adds to the current state of the art by focusing on the impact of influenceable thermostat setpoints, as opposed to less actionable factors such as house size, insulation status of the house and weather. By applying SHAP, the personal impact and differences between individual households are estimated, in contrast to only learning trends. Moreover, a machine learning model, trained on a representative dataset, is applicable at scale to other households for estimating a personal, quantified impact of setpoint choices.
利用机器学习方法来估计恒温器设定值对个人家庭天然气消耗的影响
考虑到当前世界面临的气候变化挑战,以及住宅天然气消费是能源的主要最终用途,人们比以往任何时候都更需要尽量减少家庭的能源足迹。个性化的、可操作的建议可以给人们提供建议,告诉他们可以采取哪些行动来减少住宅能源消耗,比如降低恒温器的温度。为了使这个建议具有相关性,重要的是要了解恒温器设定值对每个家庭每日天然气使用量的定量影响。在本文中,通过比较三种机器学习方法来估计这种影响。将线性回归、深度学习和梯度增强机应用于300个荷兰家庭的多维时间序列数据集。基于三个指标对这三种方法进行了比较:均方根误差(RMSE)、可解释性和可扩展性。使用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)技术来解释最佳模型(梯度增强机)的结果。这种解释方法可以量化包括恒温器设定点在内的所有输入对模型中不同个体家庭的日常用气量预测的贡献。本文通过关注可影响的恒温器设定值的影响,而不是诸如房屋大小,房屋绝缘状态和天气等不太可行的因素,增加了当前的艺术状态。通过应用SHAP,可以估计个人影响和个体家庭之间的差异,而不仅仅是学习趋势。此外,在代表性数据集上训练的机器学习模型可大规模应用于其他家庭,用于估计设定值选择的个人量化影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信