METHODICAL APPROACHES TO DETERMINING THE PROFESSIONAL SUITABILITY OF GRADUATES OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE ABSENCE OF THE NETWORK OF CENTERS FOR INDEPENDENT PROFESSIONAL EXPERTISE CERTIFICATION

S. Melnyk
{"title":"METHODICAL APPROACHES TO DETERMINING THE PROFESSIONAL SUITABILITY OF GRADUATES OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE ABSENCE OF THE NETWORK OF CENTERS FOR INDEPENDENT PROFESSIONAL EXPERTISE CERTIFICATION","authors":"S. Melnyk","doi":"10.32987/2617-8532-2021-3-42-57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the first time in domestic practice, the author of the article created methodical approaches to determining the professional suitability of graduates of educational institutions in the absence of a network of centers for independent professional expertise certification. They are aimed at reducing tensions during the employment of graduates of educational institutions, especially higher education institutions, and helping employers and employees of HR departments to assess the professional suitability of applicants for vacancies as objectively as possible. The methodical approach involves determining (based on a 100-point grading scale) if the applicant has the necessary knowledge, skills, other competencies, job expectations and professional interests, required for activities and working conditions by the applicant independently (under the supervision of experts) or directly by an independent group of experts. The proposed scenario provides for evaluation by 100-250 indicators, which are divided into 11 groups of requirements. In the future, the average evaluation results are compared with the reference values, which are previously developed by leading experts or expert groups for certain professions at the national or regional level. After that, the experts make proposals on recognizing the professional suitability of the graduate, or the need for additional training at the workplace / in the professional environment, or refusal of employment, in particular with the possibility of reassessment after a certain period.","PeriodicalId":273000,"journal":{"name":"Educational Analytics of Ukraine","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Analytics of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32987/2617-8532-2021-3-42-57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the first time in domestic practice, the author of the article created methodical approaches to determining the professional suitability of graduates of educational institutions in the absence of a network of centers for independent professional expertise certification. They are aimed at reducing tensions during the employment of graduates of educational institutions, especially higher education institutions, and helping employers and employees of HR departments to assess the professional suitability of applicants for vacancies as objectively as possible. The methodical approach involves determining (based on a 100-point grading scale) if the applicant has the necessary knowledge, skills, other competencies, job expectations and professional interests, required for activities and working conditions by the applicant independently (under the supervision of experts) or directly by an independent group of experts. The proposed scenario provides for evaluation by 100-250 indicators, which are divided into 11 groups of requirements. In the future, the average evaluation results are compared with the reference values, which are previously developed by leading experts or expert groups for certain professions at the national or regional level. After that, the experts make proposals on recognizing the professional suitability of the graduate, or the need for additional training at the workplace / in the professional environment, or refusal of employment, in particular with the possibility of reassessment after a certain period.
在缺乏独立专业技能认证中心网络的情况下,确定教育机构毕业生职业适宜性的方法
在国内实践中,本文作者首次创建了在缺乏独立专业技能认证中心网络的情况下确定教育机构毕业生专业适用性的系统方法。其目的是为了减少教育机构,特别是高等教育机构毕业生在就业过程中的紧张情绪,帮助雇主和人力资源部门的员工尽可能客观地评估申请人的专业适合性。系统的方法包括确定(基于100分的评分标准)申请人是否具有独立(在专家监督下)或直接由独立专家组进行的活动和工作条件所需的必要知识、技能、其他能力、工作期望和专业兴趣。拟议的方案规定按100-250个指标进行评价,这些指标分为11组所需经费。未来,将平均评价结果与以前由国家或区域一级某些专业的主要专家或专家组制定的参考值进行比较。之后,专家们就确认毕业生是否适合专业、是否需要在工作场所/专业环境中接受额外培训、是否拒绝就业提出建议,特别是在一段时间后重新评估的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信