Use of Radial Basis Functions and Rough Sets for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization

Luis V. Santana-Quintero, Víctor A. Serrano-Hernandez, C. Coello, A. G. Hernández-Díaz, J. M. Luque
{"title":"Use of Radial Basis Functions and Rough Sets for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization","authors":"Luis V. Santana-Quintero, Víctor A. Serrano-Hernandez, C. Coello, A. G. Hernández-Díaz, J. M. Luque","doi":"10.1109/MCDM.2007.369424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a new multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) which adopts a radial basis function (RBF) approach in order to reduce the number of fitness function evaluations performed to reach the Pareto front. The specific method adopted is derived from a comparative study conducted among several RBFs. In all cases, the NSGA-II (which is an approach representative of the state-of-the-art in the area) is adopted as our search engine with which the RBFs are hybridized. The resulting algorithm can produce very reasonable approximations of the true Pareto front with a very low number of evaluations, but is not able to spread solutions in an appropriate manner. This led us to introduce a second stage to the algorithm in which it is hybridized with rough sets theory in order to improve the spread of solutions. Rough sets, in this case, act as a local search approach which is able to generate solutions in the neighborhood of the few nondominated solutions previously generated. We show that our proposed hybrid approach only requires 2,000 fitness function evaluations in order to solve test problems with up to 30 decision variables. This is a very low value when compared with today's standards reported in the specialized literature","PeriodicalId":306422,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCDM.2007.369424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This paper presents a new multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) which adopts a radial basis function (RBF) approach in order to reduce the number of fitness function evaluations performed to reach the Pareto front. The specific method adopted is derived from a comparative study conducted among several RBFs. In all cases, the NSGA-II (which is an approach representative of the state-of-the-art in the area) is adopted as our search engine with which the RBFs are hybridized. The resulting algorithm can produce very reasonable approximations of the true Pareto front with a very low number of evaluations, but is not able to spread solutions in an appropriate manner. This led us to introduce a second stage to the algorithm in which it is hybridized with rough sets theory in order to improve the spread of solutions. Rough sets, in this case, act as a local search approach which is able to generate solutions in the neighborhood of the few nondominated solutions previously generated. We show that our proposed hybrid approach only requires 2,000 fitness function evaluations in order to solve test problems with up to 30 decision variables. This is a very low value when compared with today's standards reported in the specialized literature
径向基函数和粗糙集在进化多目标优化中的应用
本文提出了一种新的多目标进化算法(MOEA),该算法采用径向基函数(RBF)方法来减少达到Pareto前沿的适应度函数评估次数。所采用的具体方法来源于对几个rbf的比较研究。在所有情况下,NSGA-II(这是该地区最先进的方法代表)被采用作为我们的搜索引擎,rbf与之杂交。所得到的算法可以用非常少的求值次数产生非常合理的逼近真实的帕累托前沿,但不能以适当的方式传播解。这导致我们引入了算法的第二阶段,其中它与粗糙集理论相结合,以提高解的扩展性。在这种情况下,粗糙集作为一种局部搜索方法,能够在先前生成的少数非支配解的邻域中生成解。我们表明,我们提出的混合方法只需要2000个适应度函数评估,就可以解决多达30个决策变量的测试问题。这是一个非常低的值,当与今天的标准报告在专业文献
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信