Overview of AFCEN Non-Linear Benchmark in China – Improving Rules for Vessel Ratcheting Evaluation

Yu Tan, Xuejiao Shao, Enming Liang, Shuchun Zuo, Feng Lv, T. Métais, Han Liu
{"title":"Overview of AFCEN Non-Linear Benchmark in China – Improving Rules for Vessel Ratcheting Evaluation","authors":"Yu Tan, Xuejiao Shao, Enming Liang, Shuchun Zuo, Feng Lv, T. Métais, Han Liu","doi":"10.1115/icone29-93561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The French nuclear standard, RCC-M 2017 edition, has seen the inclusion of an Appendix on non-linear calculation methods: the Appendix ZC. This non-mandatory Appendix encompasses a set of rules and guidelines which can help the designer perform non-linear analyses. It includes the definition of models adequate to use, fatigue Ke factor optimization methods, etc...\n In fatigue analyses per the RCC-M B-3200 paragraph, rules on thermal ratcheting limits are exposed in paragraph B-3234.8. These rules aim at limiting any thermal ratcheting of the structure and the criteria exposed are sometimes difficult to meet, even though there is no threat to safe operation of the concerned equipment.\n Non-linear analyses in this case could be used to help meet the criteria but would need extra rules to be defined: these are considered to be added to the Appendix ZC.\n In early 2019, an international benchmark effort was launched on this topic. The case is a typical nozzle geometry subjected to both thermal and pressure transients.\n In China, some main nuclear entities have taken part in this benchmark effort: NPIC, SNPI, CNPDC and CNPE, along with the coordination of EDF and Yuansuan.\n • let participants get familiar with the benchmark and performing linear elastic calculations along with simplified RCC-M code evaluation methods. The outcome is a participant comparison of the respect or not of the code criteria.\n • perform an analysis based first on one’s own parameter identification and an Armstrong-Frederick model (with 1 and 2 parameters) and then perform the comparison with a common set of parameters.\n • use a defined cyclic stress-strain curve including full hysteresis loops to derive a common identification methodology and compare results.\n This paper aims at providing the public with a progress of the benchmark case (using ANSYS and code_aster software), the Chinese participants findings, and recommendations for the structural integrity community on the first two bullet points above.","PeriodicalId":220265,"journal":{"name":"Volume 6: Nuclear Codes, Standards, Licensing, and Regulatory Issues","volume":"os-43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 6: Nuclear Codes, Standards, Licensing, and Regulatory Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/icone29-93561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The French nuclear standard, RCC-M 2017 edition, has seen the inclusion of an Appendix on non-linear calculation methods: the Appendix ZC. This non-mandatory Appendix encompasses a set of rules and guidelines which can help the designer perform non-linear analyses. It includes the definition of models adequate to use, fatigue Ke factor optimization methods, etc... In fatigue analyses per the RCC-M B-3200 paragraph, rules on thermal ratcheting limits are exposed in paragraph B-3234.8. These rules aim at limiting any thermal ratcheting of the structure and the criteria exposed are sometimes difficult to meet, even though there is no threat to safe operation of the concerned equipment. Non-linear analyses in this case could be used to help meet the criteria but would need extra rules to be defined: these are considered to be added to the Appendix ZC. In early 2019, an international benchmark effort was launched on this topic. The case is a typical nozzle geometry subjected to both thermal and pressure transients. In China, some main nuclear entities have taken part in this benchmark effort: NPIC, SNPI, CNPDC and CNPE, along with the coordination of EDF and Yuansuan. • let participants get familiar with the benchmark and performing linear elastic calculations along with simplified RCC-M code evaluation methods. The outcome is a participant comparison of the respect or not of the code criteria. • perform an analysis based first on one’s own parameter identification and an Armstrong-Frederick model (with 1 and 2 parameters) and then perform the comparison with a common set of parameters. • use a defined cyclic stress-strain curve including full hysteresis loops to derive a common identification methodology and compare results. This paper aims at providing the public with a progress of the benchmark case (using ANSYS and code_aster software), the Chinese participants findings, and recommendations for the structural integrity community on the first two bullet points above.
中国AFCEN非线性基准研究综述——船舶棘轮评估改进规则
法国核标准RCC-M 2017版包含了关于非线性计算方法的附录:附录ZC。这个非强制性附录包含一组规则和指导方针,可以帮助设计师执行非线性分析。包括适合使用的模型定义、疲劳系数优化方法等。在根据RCC-M B-3200段进行的疲劳分析中,关于热棘轮极限的规则在B-3234.8段中有所披露。这些规则旨在限制结构的任何热棘轮,即使对有关设备的安全操作没有威胁,暴露的标准有时也难以满足。在这种情况下,非线性分析可以用来帮助满足标准,但需要定义额外的规则:这些被认为添加到附录ZC中。2019年初,就这一主题启动了一项国际基准工作。该案例是一个典型的喷嘴几何形状,受到热和压力瞬变的影响。在中国,一些主要的核实体已经参与了这一基准工作:NPIC, SNPI, CNPDC和CNPE,以及EDF和Yuansuan的协调。•让参与者熟悉基准和执行线性弹性计算以及简化的RCC-M代码评估方法。结果是参与者对是否遵守代码标准的比较。•首先根据自己的参数识别和阿姆斯特朗-弗雷德里克模型(1和2参数)进行分析,然后与一组通用参数进行比较。•使用一个定义的循环应力-应变曲线,包括完整的滞后回路,得出共同的识别方法,并比较结果。本文旨在向公众提供基准案例的进展(使用ANSYS和code_aster软件),中国参与者的发现,以及对结构完整性社区的前两个要点的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信