The Judgment of Garbage: End-of-Pipe Treatment and Waste Reduction

N. Dutt, Andrew A. King
{"title":"The Judgment of Garbage: End-of-Pipe Treatment and Waste Reduction","authors":"N. Dutt, Andrew A. King","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2013.1827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many scholars have argued that systems for treating waste impede organizations from preventing waste in the first place. They theorize that end-of-pipe EOP treatment diminishes the incentive to avoid creating waste in the production process and obscures the information necessary to devise prevention techniques. This prediction has been widely accepted, influencing both policy and practice, despite both a lack of supporting empirical evidence and the existence of a counterprediction. In this paper, we use data describing U.S. manufacturing establishments from 1991 to 2005 to test the connection between EOP treatment and waste reduction. Our findings show that EOP treatment is associated with an initial jump in reported waste, followed by ongoing reduction. We analyze these results by exploring mechanisms that may drive this relationship. For practitioners, our paper provides critical guidance about strategies for reducing waste. For scholars of environmental management, our paper provides new insight on when facilities accomplish “source reduction” of process waste. For broader management theories of operations and organizational design, our analysis provides new insight on boundary conditions for extrapolation from existing theories. Finally, our paper provides new guidance for the formulation of effective regulatory policy. \n \nThis paper was accepted by Christian Terwiesch, operations management.","PeriodicalId":172039,"journal":{"name":"Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth Research Paper Series","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

Many scholars have argued that systems for treating waste impede organizations from preventing waste in the first place. They theorize that end-of-pipe EOP treatment diminishes the incentive to avoid creating waste in the production process and obscures the information necessary to devise prevention techniques. This prediction has been widely accepted, influencing both policy and practice, despite both a lack of supporting empirical evidence and the existence of a counterprediction. In this paper, we use data describing U.S. manufacturing establishments from 1991 to 2005 to test the connection between EOP treatment and waste reduction. Our findings show that EOP treatment is associated with an initial jump in reported waste, followed by ongoing reduction. We analyze these results by exploring mechanisms that may drive this relationship. For practitioners, our paper provides critical guidance about strategies for reducing waste. For scholars of environmental management, our paper provides new insight on when facilities accomplish “source reduction” of process waste. For broader management theories of operations and organizational design, our analysis provides new insight on boundary conditions for extrapolation from existing theories. Finally, our paper provides new guidance for the formulation of effective regulatory policy. This paper was accepted by Christian Terwiesch, operations management.
垃圾的判断:管端处理与减量化
许多学者认为,处理废物的系统阻碍了组织从一开始就防止浪费。他们的理论是,管道末端EOP处理减少了避免在生产过程中产生浪费的动机,并模糊了设计预防技术所需的信息。这一预测已被广泛接受,影响了政策和实践,尽管既缺乏支持的经验证据,也存在反预测。本文使用1991 - 2005年美国制造业数据,检验EOP处理与废弃物减少之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,EOP处理与报告的废物最初的跳跃有关,随后持续减少。我们通过探索可能驱动这种关系的机制来分析这些结果。对于从业者来说,我们的论文提供了关于减少浪费策略的关键指导。对于环境管理的学者来说,我们的论文提供了关于设施何时实现过程废物“源头减量化”的新见解。对于更广泛的运营和组织设计管理理论,我们的分析为从现有理论推断的边界条件提供了新的见解。最后,本文为制定有效的监管政策提供了新的指导。本文被运营管理专业的Christian Terwiesch接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信