A Review of Digital Ethnographic Methods with Implications for Engineering Education Research

Cory Brozina, A. Johri, B. Jesiek, Russell Korte
{"title":"A Review of Digital Ethnographic Methods with Implications for Engineering Education Research","authors":"Cory Brozina, A. Johri, B. Jesiek, Russell Korte","doi":"10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Full Paper: Digital transformations are reshaping engineering practices with implications for conducting engineering education research. Given the paucity of discussion of digital methods within engineering education research, we believe it is important to examine and present to the community an overview of how digital technology is changing research practices. In this paper we focus on digital ethnography as it has implications for studies of technical education and work, which necessarily involve using, and observing how others employ digital data sources, tools, systems, methods, etc. In this paper we report preliminary results from an in-depth literature search and review. To select the papers for the review, we first examined prior meta-review papers that identified new ethnographic methods appropriate for digital contexts (e.g., network ethnography, trace ethnography, rapid ethnography, connective ethnography, focused ethnography, etc.). We then used these as keywords to search for papers that were representative of these methods and selected the 100 most cited papers from this corpus, with further screening resulting in a final collection of 91 papers. We then conducted free/open coding of the articles followed by thematic coding to identify six categories and dived deeper into one of the categories, focused on different approaches to ethnography, to further explore the various types of ethnographic methods mentioned in the collected literature. We close by discussing how emerging techniques in ethnographic field research can be applied to engineering education research with engineering work practices as an exemplar.","PeriodicalId":408497,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Full Paper: Digital transformations are reshaping engineering practices with implications for conducting engineering education research. Given the paucity of discussion of digital methods within engineering education research, we believe it is important to examine and present to the community an overview of how digital technology is changing research practices. In this paper we focus on digital ethnography as it has implications for studies of technical education and work, which necessarily involve using, and observing how others employ digital data sources, tools, systems, methods, etc. In this paper we report preliminary results from an in-depth literature search and review. To select the papers for the review, we first examined prior meta-review papers that identified new ethnographic methods appropriate for digital contexts (e.g., network ethnography, trace ethnography, rapid ethnography, connective ethnography, focused ethnography, etc.). We then used these as keywords to search for papers that were representative of these methods and selected the 100 most cited papers from this corpus, with further screening resulting in a final collection of 91 papers. We then conducted free/open coding of the articles followed by thematic coding to identify six categories and dived deeper into one of the categories, focused on different approaches to ethnography, to further explore the various types of ethnographic methods mentioned in the collected literature. We close by discussing how emerging techniques in ethnographic field research can be applied to engineering education research with engineering work practices as an exemplar.
数字人种学方法及其对工程教育研究的启示
全文:数字化转型正在重塑工程实践,并对开展工程教育研究产生影响。鉴于工程教育研究中对数字方法的讨论不足,我们认为有必要检查并向社区展示数字技术如何改变研究实践的概述。在本文中,我们关注数字人种学,因为它对技术教育和工作的研究有影响,这必然涉及使用和观察其他人如何使用数字数据源、工具、系统、方法等。在本文中,我们报告了深入的文献检索和综述的初步结果。为了选择论文进行综述,我们首先检查了先前的元综述论文,这些论文确定了适用于数字环境的新民族志方法(例如,网络民族志、追踪民族志、快速民族志、关联民族志、聚焦民族志等)。然后,我们使用这些作为关键词来搜索这些方法的代表论文,并从该语料库中选择了100篇被引用最多的论文,进一步筛选,最终收集了91篇论文。然后,我们对文章进行自由/开放编码,然后进行主题编码,以确定六个类别,并深入研究其中一个类别,重点关注不同的民族志方法,以进一步探索收集文献中提到的各种类型的民族志方法。最后,我们以工程工作实践为例,讨论了民族志领域研究中的新兴技术如何应用于工程教育研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信