On History of Romantic Overturn in Modernist Mythology

Borys Shalaghinov
{"title":"On History of Romantic Overturn in Modernist Mythology","authors":"Borys Shalaghinov","doi":"10.33608/0236-1477.2019.05.29-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with a Greek myth adopted by modern scholars, which is hypothetically treated not as an authentic picture of antiquity, but philosophical construct, developed by early German romantics on the basis of Kantian discourse. The myth-narration was understood as a way of mental transformation of the hostile environment (embodied by the rite of human sacrifice) in terms of its humanization, aesthetization, heroization, intellectualization; the purpose of individual existence was interpreted as a unity of nature, society and the person, immersion in the ‘myth-environment’ being a condition for such unity. A further evolution of the myth took place due to civilizational shifts in Europe, which ‘fragmented’ human unity and destroyed the original unity of mythology. The modernist myth (Joyce, Messiaen, Bachelard) gave place to deintellectualization, particularization and desocialization of public life that urged to turn towards the blind nature ‘before civilization’ and stimulated indifference about the last preceding stages of culture. The life force was understood as returning to pure instinct that indicates the presence of nature in man. The distinction between sophisticated connoisseurs of culture and the bourgeois ‘mass’ became especially sharp; the ‘myth’ got really destructed by transferring it from actual life to the setting of everyday comfort, bypassing the spiritual state of the individual. The ‘myth of intertextuality’ (book myth, new-Alexandrian myth) is characteristic of the period of decline, as it is oriented not towards a living person and ‘life force’, but towards narration. This tendency was most vividly reflected in N. Frye’s mythological theory (about literature as myth-making).","PeriodicalId":413949,"journal":{"name":"Академічний журнал \"Слово і Час\"","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Академічний журнал \"Слово і Час\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33608/0236-1477.2019.05.29-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper deals with a Greek myth adopted by modern scholars, which is hypothetically treated not as an authentic picture of antiquity, but philosophical construct, developed by early German romantics on the basis of Kantian discourse. The myth-narration was understood as a way of mental transformation of the hostile environment (embodied by the rite of human sacrifice) in terms of its humanization, aesthetization, heroization, intellectualization; the purpose of individual existence was interpreted as a unity of nature, society and the person, immersion in the ‘myth-environment’ being a condition for such unity. A further evolution of the myth took place due to civilizational shifts in Europe, which ‘fragmented’ human unity and destroyed the original unity of mythology. The modernist myth (Joyce, Messiaen, Bachelard) gave place to deintellectualization, particularization and desocialization of public life that urged to turn towards the blind nature ‘before civilization’ and stimulated indifference about the last preceding stages of culture. The life force was understood as returning to pure instinct that indicates the presence of nature in man. The distinction between sophisticated connoisseurs of culture and the bourgeois ‘mass’ became especially sharp; the ‘myth’ got really destructed by transferring it from actual life to the setting of everyday comfort, bypassing the spiritual state of the individual. The ‘myth of intertextuality’ (book myth, new-Alexandrian myth) is characteristic of the period of decline, as it is oriented not towards a living person and ‘life force’, but towards narration. This tendency was most vividly reflected in N. Frye’s mythological theory (about literature as myth-making).
论现代主义神话中的浪漫主义颠覆史
本文讨论的是现代学者所采用的希腊神话,它被假设为不是古代的真实图景,而是早期德国浪漫主义者在康德话语的基础上发展起来的哲学建构。神话叙事的人性化、美化、英雄化、知性化,是对人类祭祀仪式所体现的敌对环境进行心理改造的一种方式;个人存在的目的被解释为自然、社会和个人的统一,沉浸在“神话环境”中是这种统一的条件。由于欧洲的文明变迁,神话的进一步演变发生了,这“分裂”了人类的团结,破坏了神话的原始统一。现代主义神话(乔伊斯、梅西恩、巴舍拉)让位于公共生活的去智化、特殊化和去社会化,促使人们转向“文明之前”的盲目自然,并刺激人们对文化的最后阶段漠不关心。生命力被理解为回归纯粹的本能,这表明自然在人身上的存在。老练的文化鉴赏家和资产阶级“大众”之间的区别变得尤为明显;“神话”从现实生活转移到日常舒适的环境中,绕过了个人的精神状态,真正被摧毁了。“互文性神话”(书神话,新亚历山大神话)是衰落时期的特征,因为它不是面向活生生的人和“生命力”,而是面向叙事。这种倾向在弗莱的神话理论(关于文学是制造神话的理论)中得到了最生动的反映。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信