Sociocultural and Linguistic Change in Late Modern English

Lesley Milroy’s
{"title":"Sociocultural and Linguistic Change in Late Modern English","authors":"Lesley Milroy’s","doi":"10.1017/9781108564984.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present chapter is devoted to the stability paradox, that is, the apparent mismatch between the degree to which English society changes between 1700 and 1900 and the amount of language change that LModE undergoes. While there is general agreement that a great deal of sociocultural change takes place between 1700 and 1900, several linguists point to the comparative lack of structural change in LModE, especially compared with the preceding Middle and Early Modern English periods (see Sections 2.3– 2.4). This lack of correlation may seem unremarkable at first glance, as historical linguistics to some extent has a tradition of regarding a language as a self-contained entity or system that undergoes change more or less independently of what its speakers do (Lass 1980: 120). To understand why the lack of correlation between sociocultural and linguistic change is in fact problematic from the perspective of linguistic theory, it is necessary to consider insights gained from research on social networks. I discuss the general connection made in social-network theory between sociocultural and linguistic change in Section 2.2. Then follow brief surveys of sociocultural (2.3) and linguistic (2.4) change in England between 1700 and 1900. Finally, Section 2.5 synthesizes the conclusions reached in the chapter and discusses why predictions from the perspective of social-network theory appear not to be borne out by empirical linguistic data as regards Late Modern English.","PeriodicalId":342805,"journal":{"name":"Syntactic Change in Late Modern English","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Syntactic Change in Late Modern English","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108564984.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present chapter is devoted to the stability paradox, that is, the apparent mismatch between the degree to which English society changes between 1700 and 1900 and the amount of language change that LModE undergoes. While there is general agreement that a great deal of sociocultural change takes place between 1700 and 1900, several linguists point to the comparative lack of structural change in LModE, especially compared with the preceding Middle and Early Modern English periods (see Sections 2.3– 2.4). This lack of correlation may seem unremarkable at first glance, as historical linguistics to some extent has a tradition of regarding a language as a self-contained entity or system that undergoes change more or less independently of what its speakers do (Lass 1980: 120). To understand why the lack of correlation between sociocultural and linguistic change is in fact problematic from the perspective of linguistic theory, it is necessary to consider insights gained from research on social networks. I discuss the general connection made in social-network theory between sociocultural and linguistic change in Section 2.2. Then follow brief surveys of sociocultural (2.3) and linguistic (2.4) change in England between 1700 and 1900. Finally, Section 2.5 synthesizes the conclusions reached in the chapter and discusses why predictions from the perspective of social-network theory appear not to be borne out by empirical linguistic data as regards Late Modern English.
晚期现代英语的社会文化和语言变迁
本章致力于稳定性悖论,即1700年至1900年间英国社会的变化程度与LModE经历的语言变化数量之间的明显不匹配。虽然人们普遍认为在1700年到1900年之间发生了大量的社会文化变化,但一些语言学家指出,LModE的结构变化相对较少,特别是与之前的中世纪和早期现代英语时期相比(见第2.3 - 2.4节)。乍一看,这种相关性的缺乏似乎并不引人注目,因为历史语言学在某种程度上有一种传统,即将语言视为一个独立的实体或系统,其变化或多或少独立于其使用者的行为(Lass 1980: 120)。要从语言学理论的角度理解为什么社会文化和语言变化之间缺乏相关性实际上是有问题的,有必要考虑从社会网络研究中获得的见解。我在2.2节中讨论了社会网络理论在社会文化和语言变化之间的一般联系。然后跟随1700年至1900年间英国社会文化(第2.3节)和语言(第2.4节)变化的简要调查。最后,第2.5节综合了本章得出的结论,并讨论了为什么从社会网络理论的角度来看,关于晚期现代英语的预测似乎没有得到实证语言学数据的证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信