Guide for the Sustainable Intensification Assessment Framework

Mark Musumba, P. Grabowski, C. Palm, S. Snapp
{"title":"Guide for the Sustainable Intensification Assessment Framework","authors":"Mark Musumba, P. Grabowski, C. Palm, S. Snapp","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3906994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable Intensification (SI) offers a means to balance the environmental, economic, and social objectives of agriculture. Agricultural intensification may be defined as increasing output per unit input per unit time. A narrow definition of sustainable intensification is “production of more food on the same piece of land while reducing the negative environmental impacts and at the same time increasing the contributions to natural capital and flow of environmental services” (Zurek et al., 2015). The definition of SI has evolved to include non-environmental dimensions such as social issues, economics, and the human condition (Loos et al., 2014). The inclusion of social aspects helps ensure a balanced approach to the intensification process. In this guide, we present a framework of objective-oriented SI indicators organized into five domains critical for sustainability: productivity, economic, environment, human condition, and social domains. The objective-oriented indicator assessment is similar to the goal-oriented framework proposed by Olsson et al. (2009) in which objectives of the innovation are identified and then indicators are linked to the objectives to assess performance in a balanced approach across domains. The metrics for each indicator are categorized across spatial scales: field, farm, household, and landscape, so that the assessment can be used for innovations at any scale and so that cross-scale linkages can be considered (Figure 1).","PeriodicalId":223408,"journal":{"name":"AgriSciRN: Environmental Impact of Agriculture (Topic)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AgriSciRN: Environmental Impact of Agriculture (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3906994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

Sustainable Intensification (SI) offers a means to balance the environmental, economic, and social objectives of agriculture. Agricultural intensification may be defined as increasing output per unit input per unit time. A narrow definition of sustainable intensification is “production of more food on the same piece of land while reducing the negative environmental impacts and at the same time increasing the contributions to natural capital and flow of environmental services” (Zurek et al., 2015). The definition of SI has evolved to include non-environmental dimensions such as social issues, economics, and the human condition (Loos et al., 2014). The inclusion of social aspects helps ensure a balanced approach to the intensification process. In this guide, we present a framework of objective-oriented SI indicators organized into five domains critical for sustainability: productivity, economic, environment, human condition, and social domains. The objective-oriented indicator assessment is similar to the goal-oriented framework proposed by Olsson et al. (2009) in which objectives of the innovation are identified and then indicators are linked to the objectives to assess performance in a balanced approach across domains. The metrics for each indicator are categorized across spatial scales: field, farm, household, and landscape, so that the assessment can be used for innovations at any scale and so that cross-scale linkages can be considered (Figure 1).
可持续强化评估框架指南
可持续集约化(SI)为平衡农业的环境、经济和社会目标提供了一种手段。农业集约化可以定义为单位时间内每单位投入增加产出。可持续集约化的狭义定义是“在同一块土地上生产更多的食物,同时减少对环境的负面影响,同时增加对自然资本和环境服务流动的贡献”(Zurek et al., 2015)。SI的定义已经发展到包括非环境维度,如社会问题、经济和人类状况(Loos等人,2014)。包括社会方面有助于确保对加强进程采取平衡的办法。在本指南中,我们提出了一个以目标为导向的科学指数框架,将其分为对可持续性至关重要的五个领域:生产力、经济、环境、人类状况和社会领域。以目标为导向的指标评估类似于Olsson等人(2009)提出的以目标为导向的框架,其中确定创新的目标,然后将指标与目标联系起来,以跨领域的平衡方法评估绩效。每个指标的度量都在不同的空间尺度上进行了分类:田地、农场、家庭和景观,这样评估就可以用于任何尺度的创新,并且可以考虑跨尺度的联系(图1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信