The Effect of Time on the Maintenance of a Predictive Model

Joffrey L. Leevy, T. Khoshgoftaar, Richard A. Bauder, Naeem Seliya
{"title":"The Effect of Time on the Maintenance of a Predictive Model","authors":"Joffrey L. Leevy, T. Khoshgoftaar, Richard A. Bauder, Naeem Seliya","doi":"10.1109/ICMLA.2019.00304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Periodic updating of a machine learning model may become necessary because new data could have a distribution that has drifted significantly over time from the original data distribution, thus impacting the model's usefulness. The primary objective of this paper is to evaluate temporal influence on the maintenance of a predictive model. We investigate the impact of using training data from various year-groupings on a model designed to detect Medicare Part B billing fraud. Training datasets are obtained from year-groupings of 2015, 2014-2015, 2013-2015, and 2012-2015. The test dataset is represented by 2016 data. Our study utilizes five popular learners and five class ratios obtained by Random Undersampling. Using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve as the performance metric, our case study indicates that the Logistic Regression learner yields the highest overall value for the yeargrouping of 2013-2015, with a majority-to-minority ratio of 90:10. For the problem of maintaining predictive models for Medicare fraud, we conclude that a sampled dataset should be chosen over the full dataset and that the largest training dataset (i.e., 2012- 2015) does not always produce the best results. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first big data study that examines the influence of time on the maintenance of machine learning models.","PeriodicalId":436714,"journal":{"name":"2019 18th IEEE International Conference On Machine Learning And Applications (ICMLA)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 18th IEEE International Conference On Machine Learning And Applications (ICMLA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2019.00304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Periodic updating of a machine learning model may become necessary because new data could have a distribution that has drifted significantly over time from the original data distribution, thus impacting the model's usefulness. The primary objective of this paper is to evaluate temporal influence on the maintenance of a predictive model. We investigate the impact of using training data from various year-groupings on a model designed to detect Medicare Part B billing fraud. Training datasets are obtained from year-groupings of 2015, 2014-2015, 2013-2015, and 2012-2015. The test dataset is represented by 2016 data. Our study utilizes five popular learners and five class ratios obtained by Random Undersampling. Using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve as the performance metric, our case study indicates that the Logistic Regression learner yields the highest overall value for the yeargrouping of 2013-2015, with a majority-to-minority ratio of 90:10. For the problem of maintaining predictive models for Medicare fraud, we conclude that a sampled dataset should be chosen over the full dataset and that the largest training dataset (i.e., 2012- 2015) does not always produce the best results. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first big data study that examines the influence of time on the maintenance of machine learning models.
时间对预测模型维持的影响
机器学习模型的定期更新可能是必要的,因为新数据的分布可能会随着时间的推移而与原始数据分布显著偏离,从而影响模型的有用性。本文的主要目的是评估时间对预测模型维持的影响。我们研究了使用来自不同年份分组的训练数据对设计用于检测医疗保险B部分账单欺诈的模型的影响。训练数据集来自2015年、2014-2015年、2013-2015年和2012-2015年的年份组。测试数据集用2016年的数据表示。我们的研究使用了5个受欢迎的学习者和随机欠抽样得到的5个班级比例。使用接受者工作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积作为绩效指标,我们的案例研究表明,Logistic回归学习器在2013-2015年的年度分组中产生了最高的总体价值,多数与少数比例为90:10。对于维护医疗保险欺诈预测模型的问题,我们得出结论,应该选择抽样数据集而不是完整数据集,并且最大的训练数据集(即2012- 2015)并不总是产生最好的结果。据我们所知,这是第一个检验时间对机器学习模型维护影响的大数据研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信