Performance Comparison of CAODV, SEARCH, and WCETT Routing Protocols in CRAHNs

Faisal Awad Mahgoub, H. Elsayed, S. E. El Ramly
{"title":"Performance Comparison of CAODV, SEARCH, and WCETT Routing Protocols in CRAHNs","authors":"Faisal Awad Mahgoub, H. Elsayed, S. E. El Ramly","doi":"10.1109/SIMS.2016.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive radio ad hoc networks (CRAHNs) can efficiently utilize the spectrum in an opportunistic way by dynamically accessing different licensed portions of the spectrum. In CRAHNs, which operate without centralized management, data routing is one of the most important issues to be taken into account and requires intensive study. This paper analyzes three of the most common CRAHN routing protocols, namely, Cognitive Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (CAODV), SpEctrum Aware Routing protocol for Cognitive ad-Hoc networks (SEARCH), and Weighted Cumulative Estimation of Transmission Time (WCETT). The analysis is carried out using NS-2 simulator to evaluate and compare the network performance in terms of packet delivery ratio (PDR), end-to-end delay, hop count, and routing overhead under the same environment conditions with varying number of nodes to study the effect of nodes density and traffic load. Simulation results show that the performance of SEARCH is better than CAODV and WCETT in terms of PDR with little increased overhead, average end-to-end delay, and hop count compared to CAODV because of its better route selection strategy in CRAHNs.","PeriodicalId":308996,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Systems Informatics, Modelling and Simulation (SIMS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Systems Informatics, Modelling and Simulation (SIMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIMS.2016.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cognitive radio ad hoc networks (CRAHNs) can efficiently utilize the spectrum in an opportunistic way by dynamically accessing different licensed portions of the spectrum. In CRAHNs, which operate without centralized management, data routing is one of the most important issues to be taken into account and requires intensive study. This paper analyzes three of the most common CRAHN routing protocols, namely, Cognitive Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (CAODV), SpEctrum Aware Routing protocol for Cognitive ad-Hoc networks (SEARCH), and Weighted Cumulative Estimation of Transmission Time (WCETT). The analysis is carried out using NS-2 simulator to evaluate and compare the network performance in terms of packet delivery ratio (PDR), end-to-end delay, hop count, and routing overhead under the same environment conditions with varying number of nodes to study the effect of nodes density and traffic load. Simulation results show that the performance of SEARCH is better than CAODV and WCETT in terms of PDR with little increased overhead, average end-to-end delay, and hop count compared to CAODV because of its better route selection strategy in CRAHNs.
网络中CAODV、SEARCH和WCETT路由协议的性能比较
认知无线电自组织网络(CRAHNs)可以通过动态访问频谱的不同许可部分,以机会主义的方式有效利用频谱。在没有集中管理的crahn中,数据路由是需要考虑和深入研究的重要问题之一。本文分析了三种最常见的CRAHN路由协议,即认知自组织按需距离矢量(CAODV)、认知自组织网络的频谱感知路由协议(SEARCH)和传输时间加权累积估计(WCETT)。利用NS-2模拟器对相同环境条件下不同节点数量下的网络性能进行评估和比较,包括包投递率(PDR)、端到端延迟、跳数和路由开销,研究节点密度和流量负载的影响。仿真结果表明,由于在CRAHNs中具有更好的路由选择策略,因此SEARCH在PDR、平均端到端延迟和跳数方面都优于CAODV和WCETT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信