EU macro-regional strategies for the Baltic Sea Region after 2020. A nutshell of beauty and possibilities

Europa XXI Pub Date : 2019-06-10 DOI:10.7163/EU21.2020.38.1
J. Zaucha, K. Böhme, D. Pyć, Lilia Neumann, Aziewicz Dominik
{"title":"EU macro-regional strategies for the Baltic Sea Region after 2020. A nutshell of beauty and possibilities","authors":"J. Zaucha, K. Böhme, D. Pyć, Lilia Neumann, Aziewicz Dominik","doi":"10.7163/EU21.2020.38.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, that celebrates this year in Gdańsk its tenth anniversary, has been considered by many scholars and the decision makers as the model example of the soft governance that has gained in importance in the enlarged European Union (EU). The paper analyses the achievements and shortcomings of the Strategy from economic perspective with focus on externalities, public goods (also club goods, common-pool resources), economies of scale and scope and transaction costs. Two cases: Single Market for services and innovation spillovers are discussed more in depth. The analysis of these challenges and opportunities as well as the performance of the Strategy in the past and comparative analysis of its various evaluations allow authors to formulate several assumptions that should save the Strategy for the future. Their essence is related to mainstreaming of the Strategy into the EU and national policies (ensuring its stronger policy impact), strengthening strategic, visionary approach of the Strategy (e.g. facilitating large Baltic projects), better alignment with the business sector activities (understanding and addressing this sector expectations towards macro-regional co-operation) and acknowledgement of macro-regional solidarity as a foundation of the common efforts. Without all these, the Strategy might follow the case of the Baltic Development Forum that ceased to exist despite its evident positive effects for the entire region. Soft governance is difficult but promising as an alternative to the overgrowing sentiments towards centralisation. Thus, to avoid the impression of the “Titanic ball” Gdańsk celebrations should provide a new start instead of the business as usual and manifestation of shallow self-satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":120225,"journal":{"name":"Europa XXI","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europa XXI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7163/EU21.2020.38.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, that celebrates this year in Gdańsk its tenth anniversary, has been considered by many scholars and the decision makers as the model example of the soft governance that has gained in importance in the enlarged European Union (EU). The paper analyses the achievements and shortcomings of the Strategy from economic perspective with focus on externalities, public goods (also club goods, common-pool resources), economies of scale and scope and transaction costs. Two cases: Single Market for services and innovation spillovers are discussed more in depth. The analysis of these challenges and opportunities as well as the performance of the Strategy in the past and comparative analysis of its various evaluations allow authors to formulate several assumptions that should save the Strategy for the future. Their essence is related to mainstreaming of the Strategy into the EU and national policies (ensuring its stronger policy impact), strengthening strategic, visionary approach of the Strategy (e.g. facilitating large Baltic projects), better alignment with the business sector activities (understanding and addressing this sector expectations towards macro-regional co-operation) and acknowledgement of macro-regional solidarity as a foundation of the common efforts. Without all these, the Strategy might follow the case of the Baltic Development Forum that ceased to exist despite its evident positive effects for the entire region. Soft governance is difficult but promising as an alternative to the overgrowing sentiments towards centralisation. Thus, to avoid the impression of the “Titanic ball” Gdańsk celebrations should provide a new start instead of the business as usual and manifestation of shallow self-satisfaction.
欧盟2020年后波罗的海地区宏观区域战略。美丽和可能性的结晶
今年是欧盟波罗的海地区战略(Gdańsk)十周年,许多学者和决策者将其视为软治理的典范,软治理在扩大后的欧盟(EU)中越来越重要。本文从外部性、公共物品(也包括俱乐部物品、公共资源)、规模经济和范围经济以及交易成本等方面从经济学角度分析了该战略的成就与不足。两个案例:服务业单一市场和创新溢出效应。对这些挑战和机遇的分析,以及该战略过去的执行情况,以及对其各种评价的比较分析,使作者能够提出若干假设,为未来保留该战略。其实质是将战略纳入欧盟和国家政策的主流(确保其更强的政策影响),加强战略的战略性和前瞻性方法(例如促进大型波罗的海项目),更好地与商业部门活动保持一致(理解和解决该部门对宏观区域合作的期望),并承认宏观区域团结是共同努力的基础。如果没有所有这些,该战略可能会像波罗的海发展论坛那样,尽管它对整个区域产生了明显的积极影响,但它已不复存在。软治理是困难的,但作为一种替代过度增长的对中央集权的情绪是有希望的。因此,为了避免给人留下“泰坦尼克号舞会”的印象,Gdańsk庆祝活动应该提供一个新的开始,而不是一切照旧,表现出肤浅的自我满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信