Modulation choices for LPI/LPD communication systems

L.E. Smith
{"title":"Modulation choices for LPI/LPD communication systems","authors":"L.E. Smith","doi":"10.1109/TCC.1994.472090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only. The need for low probability of intercept/low probability of detection (LPI/LPD) systems has been recognized by the military and civilian agencies. Industry's first attempts at developing such systems were based upon the use of traditional spread spectrum techniques such as frequency hopping and pseudonoise spreading with a lowered transmitted power. Subsequent research and testing has shown that lowering the power on traditional spread spectrum systems does not make them LPI. Research at the Naval Command Control and Ocean Surveillance Center, RDT&E Division Detachment Warminster, PA (NRaD Detachment Warminster) has centered on the development of waveforms that are not detectable using either energy detectors or feature detectors. NRaD has sponsored corporate research and development, as well as performed in house research and development of communication waveforms that are intended to defeat various types of feature detectors. This paper addresses potential threats to communication signals and then discusses the results of various programs to develop waveforms that defeat some of these threats. The detection of LPI/LPD signals will most likely be performed with special advanced detectors, and not simple radio systems. These advanced detectors mostly fall into a category known as feature detectors. As the name implies, feature detectors target certain highly detectable features of the LPI waveform such as the carrier, chip rate, hop rate, etc. Concerns for airborne LPI are also discussed.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":206310,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of TCC'94 - Tactical Communications Conference","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of TCC'94 - Tactical Communications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.1994.472090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Summary form only. The need for low probability of intercept/low probability of detection (LPI/LPD) systems has been recognized by the military and civilian agencies. Industry's first attempts at developing such systems were based upon the use of traditional spread spectrum techniques such as frequency hopping and pseudonoise spreading with a lowered transmitted power. Subsequent research and testing has shown that lowering the power on traditional spread spectrum systems does not make them LPI. Research at the Naval Command Control and Ocean Surveillance Center, RDT&E Division Detachment Warminster, PA (NRaD Detachment Warminster) has centered on the development of waveforms that are not detectable using either energy detectors or feature detectors. NRaD has sponsored corporate research and development, as well as performed in house research and development of communication waveforms that are intended to defeat various types of feature detectors. This paper addresses potential threats to communication signals and then discusses the results of various programs to develop waveforms that defeat some of these threats. The detection of LPI/LPD signals will most likely be performed with special advanced detectors, and not simple radio systems. These advanced detectors mostly fall into a category known as feature detectors. As the name implies, feature detectors target certain highly detectable features of the LPI waveform such as the carrier, chip rate, hop rate, etc. Concerns for airborne LPI are also discussed.<>
LPI/LPD通信系统的调制选择
只有摘要形式。对低拦截/低探测概率(LPI/LPD)系统的需求已经被军事和民用机构认可。业界在开发此类系统方面的首次尝试是基于使用传统的扩频技术,如跳频和低发射功率的伪噪声扩频。随后的研究和测试表明,降低传统扩频系统的功耗并不能使其达到LPI。美国海军指挥控制和海洋监视中心的研究主要集中在开发无法使用能量探测器或特征探测器检测到的波形。NRaD赞助了公司的研究和开发,并在内部进行了通信波形的研究和开发,旨在击败各种类型的特征检测器。本文讨论了通信信号的潜在威胁,然后讨论了各种程序开发波形的结果,以击败其中一些威胁。LPI/LPD信号的探测很可能需要特殊的先进探测器,而不是简单的无线电系统。这些高级检测器大多属于特征检测器的一类。顾名思义,特征检测器针对LPI波形中某些高度可检测的特征,如载波、芯片速率、跳频等。对机载LPI的关注也进行了讨论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信