Difference of vacuum arc appearance between CuBi and CuCr electrodes

S. Suzuki, E. Kaneko, S. Kobayashi, S. Yanabu
{"title":"Difference of vacuum arc appearance between CuBi and CuCr electrodes","authors":"S. Suzuki, E. Kaneko, S. Kobayashi, S. Yanabu","doi":"10.1109/DEIV.2004.1418649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that axial magnetic field electrodes can interrupt higher current than other types of electrode. The arcs in the electrode spread uniformly in the inter-electrode space and, thus, the electrodes are hardly damaged by the arcs. As interruption tests of the axial magnetic electrodes indicate, CuCr has higher interruption capability than CuBi. Some differences of arc appearances between CuBi and CuCr vacuum arcs might he expected. To clarify these differences, we conducted arc observation tests of axial magnetic field electrodes with CuBi or CuCr contact material using a de-mountable chamber. We used digital high speed CCD video-cameras with and without infrared sensitivity, and set them to observe the vacuum arcs obliquely toward anode or cathode electrodes. The diameter of these electrodes was 52 mm. If we use these electrodes, interruption of 30-35kA of crest value is expected for CuCr electrode and much less is expected for CuBi electrode. Following phenomena were observed. 1) Many bright spots with visible size were observed during arcing period in CuBi electrodes, not in CuCr electrodes. 2) Big difference was not observed in arc distribution between CuBi and CuCr electrodes. 3) Uneven distributions of infra-red images on the electrode surface were observed in high arc current periods. These are suggesting the reasons of CuCr's higher capability of current interruption.","PeriodicalId":137370,"journal":{"name":"XXIst International Symposium on Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, 2004. Proceedings. ISDEIV.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"XXIst International Symposium on Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, 2004. Proceedings. ISDEIV.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEIV.2004.1418649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well known that axial magnetic field electrodes can interrupt higher current than other types of electrode. The arcs in the electrode spread uniformly in the inter-electrode space and, thus, the electrodes are hardly damaged by the arcs. As interruption tests of the axial magnetic electrodes indicate, CuCr has higher interruption capability than CuBi. Some differences of arc appearances between CuBi and CuCr vacuum arcs might he expected. To clarify these differences, we conducted arc observation tests of axial magnetic field electrodes with CuBi or CuCr contact material using a de-mountable chamber. We used digital high speed CCD video-cameras with and without infrared sensitivity, and set them to observe the vacuum arcs obliquely toward anode or cathode electrodes. The diameter of these electrodes was 52 mm. If we use these electrodes, interruption of 30-35kA of crest value is expected for CuCr electrode and much less is expected for CuBi electrode. Following phenomena were observed. 1) Many bright spots with visible size were observed during arcing period in CuBi electrodes, not in CuCr electrodes. 2) Big difference was not observed in arc distribution between CuBi and CuCr electrodes. 3) Uneven distributions of infra-red images on the electrode surface were observed in high arc current periods. These are suggesting the reasons of CuCr's higher capability of current interruption.
CuBi电极和CuCr电极真空电弧外观的差异
众所周知,轴向磁场电极比其他类型的电极可以中断更大的电流。电极内的电弧在电极间均匀扩散,电极不易被电弧破坏。轴向磁电极的中断试验表明,CuCr比CuBi具有更高的中断能力。CuBi真空电弧与CuCr真空电弧在外形上存在一定的差异。为了澄清这些差异,我们使用可拆卸的室对CuBi或CuCr接触材料的轴向磁场电极进行了电弧观察试验。我们使用带和不带红外灵敏度的数字高速CCD摄像机,并设置它们来观察真空弧斜向阳极或阴极电极。这些电极的直径为52毫米。如果我们使用这些电极,CuCr电极的峰值中断预计为30-35kA,而CuBi电极的峰值中断预计要小得多。观察到以下现象:1) CuBi电极在电弧形成期间出现了许多可见大小的亮点,而CuCr电极则没有。2) CuBi电极与CuCr电极的电弧分布无明显差异。3)在高电弧电流周期,电极表面红外图像分布不均匀。这些都说明了CuCr具有较高的电流中断能力的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信