Commissioning of healthcare through competitive and cooperative mechanisms under the HSCA 2012

D. Osipovic, P. Allen, E. Shepherd, Christina Petsoulas, A. Coleman, Neil Perkins, Lorrainea Williams, M. Sanderson
{"title":"Commissioning of healthcare through competitive and cooperative mechanisms under the HSCA 2012","authors":"D. Osipovic, P. Allen, E. Shepherd, Christina Petsoulas, A. Coleman, Neil Perkins, Lorrainea Williams, M. Sanderson","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvz938mt.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 6 reports a longitudinal study of commissioners’ (and providers’) use of competition and cooperation. This chapter reports research which aimed to investigate how commissioners in local health systems managed the interplay of competition and cooperation in their local health economies, looking at acute, mental health and community health services. The understanding of the regulatory context of the NHS market by both commissioners and providers of care was unclear. There were differences between local areas in terms of the volume and mode of using competition as a commissioning mechanism, with some having more enthusiasm for and experience in running competitive procurements than others. Commissioners noted that the procurement process was very resource intensive. By 2018 there was a marked decline in the appetite to use competition, especially for large scale service reconfigurations. Collaborative planning involving key local providers was a preferred way for CCG commissioners to approach large commissioning tasks.","PeriodicalId":115287,"journal":{"name":"Commissioning Healthcare in England","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Commissioning Healthcare in England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvz938mt.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 6 reports a longitudinal study of commissioners’ (and providers’) use of competition and cooperation. This chapter reports research which aimed to investigate how commissioners in local health systems managed the interplay of competition and cooperation in their local health economies, looking at acute, mental health and community health services. The understanding of the regulatory context of the NHS market by both commissioners and providers of care was unclear. There were differences between local areas in terms of the volume and mode of using competition as a commissioning mechanism, with some having more enthusiasm for and experience in running competitive procurements than others. Commissioners noted that the procurement process was very resource intensive. By 2018 there was a marked decline in the appetite to use competition, especially for large scale service reconfigurations. Collaborative planning involving key local providers was a preferred way for CCG commissioners to approach large commissioning tasks.
根据《2012年卫生保健服务法案》,通过竞争和合作机制进行医疗保健服务的委托
第6章报告了对委员(和提供者)使用竞争与合作的纵向研究。本章报告的研究旨在调查地方卫生系统的专员如何管理当地卫生经济中竞争与合作的相互作用,着眼于急性、精神卫生和社区卫生服务。委员和护理提供者对NHS市场监管环境的理解尚不清楚。地方之间在使用竞争作为委托机制的数量和方式方面存在差异,有些地方对进行竞争性采购的热情和经验比其他地方更丰富。专员们注意到,采购过程非常耗费资源。到2018年,利用竞争的意愿明显下降,特别是对于大规模的服务重组。涉及关键本地供应商的协作规划是CCG专员处理大型调试任务的首选方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信