PSYCHOLOGY OF TRANSITIVITY: TYPES OF SPACE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CHRONOTOPE

N. S. Poleva
{"title":"PSYCHOLOGY OF TRANSITIVITY: TYPES OF SPACE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CHRONOTOPE","authors":"N. S. Poleva","doi":"10.28995/2073-6398-2022-4-14-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The absence of a single universal concept of mixed “reality” suggests the importance of context for its understanding and interpretation. The psychological context of understanding the space of mixed reality or mixed space in the psychology of transitivity is analyzed using the construct “psychological chronotope”. It is established that the presence of an objective space-time continuum of mixed reality in the structure of the chronotope does not always guarantee its representation at the subjective level, which indicates the heterochrony of its objective and subjective components. It is provided that a person perceives and experiences overlaps and intersections of the real and virtual dimensions as a single space-time continuum at the subjective level, it will be experienced as a continuum of mixed reality. In the case of heterochrony, the real and virtual space-time continuums are perceived and experienced at the subjective level as non-intersecting online and offline realities. To define mixed reality in a socio-psychological context, the key point is the emotional component – the attitude and human experience of his living environment as a mixed reality. An attempt is made to transfer the research focus to such a property of the chronotope as heterotopy and use the concept of heterotopy by M. Foucault as a tool for analyzing the space of virtual reality. In scientific or artistic reflection, the appeal to heterotopia in solving research problems is associated with the opposition of a certain space to other existing spaces and endowing it with the features of “otherness”. This creates an opportunity to display the semantic versatility of the space under study through the identification and interpretation of the meanings embedded in its understanding. It is emphasized that the very structure of the chronotope does not imply homogeneity and includes many different spaces. Therefore, the concept of psychological chronotope can be considered relevant and selfsufficient for their analysis","PeriodicalId":253464,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Psychology. Pedagogics. Education","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Psychology. Pedagogics. Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2022-4-14-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The absence of a single universal concept of mixed “reality” suggests the importance of context for its understanding and interpretation. The psychological context of understanding the space of mixed reality or mixed space in the psychology of transitivity is analyzed using the construct “psychological chronotope”. It is established that the presence of an objective space-time continuum of mixed reality in the structure of the chronotope does not always guarantee its representation at the subjective level, which indicates the heterochrony of its objective and subjective components. It is provided that a person perceives and experiences overlaps and intersections of the real and virtual dimensions as a single space-time continuum at the subjective level, it will be experienced as a continuum of mixed reality. In the case of heterochrony, the real and virtual space-time continuums are perceived and experienced at the subjective level as non-intersecting online and offline realities. To define mixed reality in a socio-psychological context, the key point is the emotional component – the attitude and human experience of his living environment as a mixed reality. An attempt is made to transfer the research focus to such a property of the chronotope as heterotopy and use the concept of heterotopy by M. Foucault as a tool for analyzing the space of virtual reality. In scientific or artistic reflection, the appeal to heterotopia in solving research problems is associated with the opposition of a certain space to other existing spaces and endowing it with the features of “otherness”. This creates an opportunity to display the semantic versatility of the space under study through the identification and interpretation of the meanings embedded in its understanding. It is emphasized that the very structure of the chronotope does not imply homogeneity and includes many different spaces. Therefore, the concept of psychological chronotope can be considered relevant and selfsufficient for their analysis
及物性心理学:空间类型与心理时位
混合“现实”缺乏一个单一的普遍概念,这表明背景对其理解和解释的重要性。运用“心理时位”的概念,分析了及物性心理学中理解混合现实空间或混合空间的心理语境。结果表明,混合现实的客观时空连续体在时间表结构中的存在并不一定保证其在主观层面上的表现,这表明其客观和主观成分的非时代性。如果一个人在主观层面上将真实维度和虚拟维度的重叠和交叉点感知和体验为单一时空连续体,那么它将被体验为混合现实的连续体。在异时性的情况下,真实和虚拟的时空连续体在主观层面被感知和体验为不相交的在线和离线现实。在社会心理学语境下定义混合现实,关键是情感成分——他对生活环境作为混合现实的态度和人类体验。试图将研究焦点转移到时间位的异位性这一属性上,并将福柯的异位概念作为分析虚拟现实空间的工具。在科学或艺术的反思中,为了解决研究问题而诉诸异托邦,是指某一空间与其他已有空间的对立,并赋予其“他者性”的特征。这创造了一个机会,通过识别和解释其理解中嵌入的意义来展示所研究空间的语义多样性。需要强调的是,计时器的结构本身并不意味着同质性,它包括许多不同的空间。因此,心理时位的概念可以被认为是相关的和自给自足的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信