The role of ocular coherence tomography angiography in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy and a comparison with the current gold standard fundus fluorescein angiography

Rayyan Zakir, Kashif Iqbal, Ammar Afzal Tarar, Zeeshan Azhar, M. H. Ali, Nauman Hashmani, Mohammad Zakir
{"title":"The role of ocular coherence tomography angiography in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy and a comparison with the current gold standard fundus fluorescein angiography","authors":"Rayyan Zakir, Kashif Iqbal, Ammar Afzal Tarar, Zeeshan Azhar, M. H. Ali, Nauman Hashmani, Mohammad Zakir","doi":"10.37018/ioox6573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of preventable blindness in the world. Efficient and effective diagnosis and surveillance of diabetic retinopathy is of crucial importance to preserve the vision of patients. The FAZ (Foveal Avascular Zone) area is enlarged in patients of diabetic retinopathy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of OCT-A (Optical Coherence Tomography-Angiography) in delineating the FAZ area in cases of diabetic retinopathy and make a comparison with the findings of FFA (fundus fluorescein angiography) - the current gold standard.Subjects and methods: This was a comparative analytical study carried out at a tertiary care hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. A series of 50 patients, 30 males and 20 females with a mean age of 40 years were selected from the hospital outpatient department with history of five years of diabetic retinopathy. They were classified according to the ETDRS classification system into NPDR and PDR groups. The patients were booked for OCT-A, the scans were then observed for findings with a specific focus on the area of the FAZ at the level of the superficial capillary plexus. The patients then underwent same day FFA the current gold standard modality for diabetic retinopathy, thereafter a comparison between the mean area of the FAZ in both the modalities was made & documented. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 25.0. Results: The FAZ was easily distinguished by both FFA and OCT-A. The mean FAZ area was 0.62 mm2 on FFA and 0.69 mm2 on OCT-A. There was a statistically significant difference between the two means (p=0.002). Both the modalities had a Sensitivity of 100% at 0.44 and 0.48 cut-offs. OCT-A had a specificity of 91.9% and FFA had a Specificity of 89.2%.Conclusions: OCT-A proved to be an effective and accurate modality in delineating the FAZ area and detecting macular ischemia in patients of diabetic retinopathy in comparison to the current Gold-Standard FFA.","PeriodicalId":349972,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37018/ioox6573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of preventable blindness in the world. Efficient and effective diagnosis and surveillance of diabetic retinopathy is of crucial importance to preserve the vision of patients. The FAZ (Foveal Avascular Zone) area is enlarged in patients of diabetic retinopathy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of OCT-A (Optical Coherence Tomography-Angiography) in delineating the FAZ area in cases of diabetic retinopathy and make a comparison with the findings of FFA (fundus fluorescein angiography) - the current gold standard.Subjects and methods: This was a comparative analytical study carried out at a tertiary care hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. A series of 50 patients, 30 males and 20 females with a mean age of 40 years were selected from the hospital outpatient department with history of five years of diabetic retinopathy. They were classified according to the ETDRS classification system into NPDR and PDR groups. The patients were booked for OCT-A, the scans were then observed for findings with a specific focus on the area of the FAZ at the level of the superficial capillary plexus. The patients then underwent same day FFA the current gold standard modality for diabetic retinopathy, thereafter a comparison between the mean area of the FAZ in both the modalities was made & documented. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 25.0. Results: The FAZ was easily distinguished by both FFA and OCT-A. The mean FAZ area was 0.62 mm2 on FFA and 0.69 mm2 on OCT-A. There was a statistically significant difference between the two means (p=0.002). Both the modalities had a Sensitivity of 100% at 0.44 and 0.48 cut-offs. OCT-A had a specificity of 91.9% and FFA had a Specificity of 89.2%.Conclusions: OCT-A proved to be an effective and accurate modality in delineating the FAZ area and detecting macular ischemia in patients of diabetic retinopathy in comparison to the current Gold-Standard FFA.
眼相干断层血管造影在糖尿病视网膜病变诊断中的作用及与现行金标准眼底荧光素血管造影的比较
背景:糖尿病视网膜病变是世界上可预防失明的主要原因。对糖尿病视网膜病变进行有效的诊断和监测对保护患者的视力至关重要。糖尿病视网膜病变患者FAZ(中央凹无血管区)面积增大。本研究的目的是评估OCT-A(光学相干断层扫描血管造影)在糖尿病视网膜病变病例中划定FAZ区域的准确性,并与目前的金标准眼底荧光素血管造影(FFA)的结果进行比较。研究对象和方法:这是一项在巴基斯坦拉合尔一家三级保健医院进行的比较分析研究。选取医院门诊部5年糖尿病视网膜病变病史患者50例,男30例,女20例,平均年龄40岁。根据ETDRS分类系统将其分为NPDR和PDR两组。患者被预约进行OCT-A扫描,然后观察在浅毛细血管丛水平的FAZ区域的特定焦点的发现。然后,患者在当天接受了目前糖尿病视网膜病变的金标准模式——FFA,随后对两种模式下的FAZ平均面积进行了比较并记录。数据分析采用SPSS 25.0版本。结果:FFA和OCT-A均能很好地鉴别FAZ。FFA和OCT-A的平均FAZ面积分别为0.62 mm2和0.69 mm2。两平均值差异有统计学意义(p=0.002)。两种方式在0.44和0.48截止点的灵敏度均为100%。OCT-A特异性为91.9%,FFA特异性为89.2%。结论:与现行金标准FFA相比,OCT-A在糖尿病视网膜病变患者FAZ区域划定和黄斑缺血检测方面是一种有效、准确的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信