Economic Optimization of Inlet Air Filtration for Gas Turbines

D. Grace, Christopher A. Perullo, J. Kee
{"title":"Economic Optimization of Inlet Air Filtration for Gas Turbines","authors":"D. Grace, Christopher A. Perullo, J. Kee","doi":"10.1115/GT2018-75435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selecting the appropriate level of filtration for a gas turbine helps to minimize overall unit costs and maximize net revenue. When selecting a filter type and configuration, one must consider the initial costs, operational costs, and ongoing maintenance costs for both the filter and corresponding impacts on unit performance. Calculations are complex, and a fully functional framework is needed to properly account for all aspects of the life cycle and provide an opportunity to optimize filter selection and water wash scenarios for specific plant operating conditions. Decisions can generally be based on several different criteria. For instance, one may wish to minimize maintenance costs, maximize revenue, minimize fuel consumption, etc. For criteria that can be expressed in monetary terms, Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) is a means to simultaneously consider all criteria and reduce them to a single parameter for optimization using present value arithmetic. To be practically applied, the analysis must include all the significant inputs that would have an impact on the relative comparison between alternatives, while excluding minor inputs that would unduly add to complexity.\n This paper provides an integrated, quantitative, and transparent approach to life cycle cost analysis for gas turbine inlet filtration. Most prior art tends to focus either on how to perform the life cycle cost analysis (with simplified assumptions on the impact of filtration on performance), or on a specific technical aspect of filtration such as filter efficiency and performance, the impact of dust on compressor blading and fouling, or the impact of fouling on overall gas turbine performance. Many of these studies provide useful insight into specific aspects of gas turbine degradation due to fouling, but make simplifying assumptions that can lead to inaccuracies in application.\n By heavily leveraging prior work, this paper provides the reader with an overview of all aspects of the functionality required to perform such a life cycle analysis for gas turbine filtration. This work also serves as a technical summary of the underlying physics models that lead to the development of EPRI’s Air Filter Life-Cycle Optimizer (AFLCO) software. The software tool provides a method to account for the influence of gas turbine type, operating conditions, load profile, filtration choices, and wash type and frequency on overall life-cycle costs. The AFLCO tool is focused on guiding the user to make optimum filter selections and water wash scheduling, accounting for all the significant parameters that affect the economic outcome. Revenue and cost quantities are considered simultaneously to determine the net present value of gross revenue minus filtration and water wash costs over a multiple year analysis period. The user defines the scenarios and the software displays the net present value (NPV) and present value difference between the scenarios. The preferred configuration from an LCCA perspective is that which yields the highest present value for net revenue. The user can iterate on multiple scenarios to seek further increases in NPV. The paper provides relevant example case studies to illustrate how LCCA evaluations of inlet air filters and water wash frequency can be applied to optimize gas turbine economic performance.\n The intent of the paper is to provide the user with a summary of prior work that can be integrated to provide a more holistic, complete life cycle cost analysis and describes the framework used within the AFLCO software. The underlying technical analysis in this paper can be applied to any life cycle cost analysis.","PeriodicalId":131179,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Coal, Biomass, and Alternative Fuels; Cycle Innovations; Electric Power; Industrial and Cogeneration; Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Coal, Biomass, and Alternative Fuels; Cycle Innovations; Electric Power; Industrial and Cogeneration; Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-75435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selecting the appropriate level of filtration for a gas turbine helps to minimize overall unit costs and maximize net revenue. When selecting a filter type and configuration, one must consider the initial costs, operational costs, and ongoing maintenance costs for both the filter and corresponding impacts on unit performance. Calculations are complex, and a fully functional framework is needed to properly account for all aspects of the life cycle and provide an opportunity to optimize filter selection and water wash scenarios for specific plant operating conditions. Decisions can generally be based on several different criteria. For instance, one may wish to minimize maintenance costs, maximize revenue, minimize fuel consumption, etc. For criteria that can be expressed in monetary terms, Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) is a means to simultaneously consider all criteria and reduce them to a single parameter for optimization using present value arithmetic. To be practically applied, the analysis must include all the significant inputs that would have an impact on the relative comparison between alternatives, while excluding minor inputs that would unduly add to complexity. This paper provides an integrated, quantitative, and transparent approach to life cycle cost analysis for gas turbine inlet filtration. Most prior art tends to focus either on how to perform the life cycle cost analysis (with simplified assumptions on the impact of filtration on performance), or on a specific technical aspect of filtration such as filter efficiency and performance, the impact of dust on compressor blading and fouling, or the impact of fouling on overall gas turbine performance. Many of these studies provide useful insight into specific aspects of gas turbine degradation due to fouling, but make simplifying assumptions that can lead to inaccuracies in application. By heavily leveraging prior work, this paper provides the reader with an overview of all aspects of the functionality required to perform such a life cycle analysis for gas turbine filtration. This work also serves as a technical summary of the underlying physics models that lead to the development of EPRI’s Air Filter Life-Cycle Optimizer (AFLCO) software. The software tool provides a method to account for the influence of gas turbine type, operating conditions, load profile, filtration choices, and wash type and frequency on overall life-cycle costs. The AFLCO tool is focused on guiding the user to make optimum filter selections and water wash scheduling, accounting for all the significant parameters that affect the economic outcome. Revenue and cost quantities are considered simultaneously to determine the net present value of gross revenue minus filtration and water wash costs over a multiple year analysis period. The user defines the scenarios and the software displays the net present value (NPV) and present value difference between the scenarios. The preferred configuration from an LCCA perspective is that which yields the highest present value for net revenue. The user can iterate on multiple scenarios to seek further increases in NPV. The paper provides relevant example case studies to illustrate how LCCA evaluations of inlet air filters and water wash frequency can be applied to optimize gas turbine economic performance. The intent of the paper is to provide the user with a summary of prior work that can be integrated to provide a more holistic, complete life cycle cost analysis and describes the framework used within the AFLCO software. The underlying technical analysis in this paper can be applied to any life cycle cost analysis.
燃气轮机进气过滤的经济性优化
为燃气轮机选择合适的过滤水平有助于最小化整体单位成本和最大化净收入。在选择过滤器类型和配置时,必须考虑过滤器的初始成本、操作成本和持续维护成本以及对机组性能的相应影响。计算是复杂的,需要一个功能齐全的框架来适当地考虑生命周期的各个方面,并提供优化过滤器选择和特定工厂操作条件下的水洗方案的机会。决策通常可以基于几个不同的标准。例如,人们可能希望最小化维护成本,最大化收入,最小化燃料消耗等。对于可以用货币表示的标准,生命周期成本分析(LCCA)是同时考虑所有标准并使用现值算法将其简化为单个参数进行优化的一种手段。为了实际应用,分析必须包括所有会对备选方案之间的相对比较产生影响的重要投入,同时排除会过度增加复杂性的次要投入。本文为燃气轮机进气过滤的全寿命周期成本分析提供了一种综合、定量和透明的方法。大多数现有技术倾向于关注如何执行生命周期成本分析(对过滤对性能的影响进行简化假设),或者关注过滤的特定技术方面,例如过滤器效率和性能,粉尘对压缩机叶片和污垢的影响,或污垢对整体燃气轮机性能的影响。这些研究中有许多对燃气轮机因污垢而退化的具体方面提供了有用的见解,但做出了简化的假设,可能导致应用中的不准确。通过充分利用以前的工作,本文为读者提供了执行燃气轮机过滤生命周期分析所需功能的各个方面的概述。这项工作还可以作为导致EPRI空气过滤器生命周期优化器(AFLCO)软件开发的底层物理模型的技术总结。该软件工具提供了一种方法来考虑燃气轮机类型、运行条件、负载分布、过滤选择以及洗涤类型和频率对整个生命周期成本的影响。AFLCO工具的重点是指导用户做出最佳的过滤器选择和水洗计划,考虑到所有影响经济结果的重要参数。同时考虑收入和成本数量,以确定在多年分析期间的总收入减去过滤和水洗成本的净现值。用户定义场景,软件显示净现值(NPV)和场景之间的现值差。从LCCA的角度来看,首选的配置是产生净收入最高现值的配置。用户可以迭代多个场景,以寻求NPV的进一步增加。本文提供了相关的实例研究,以说明如何将进口空气过滤器和水洗频率的LCCA评估应用于优化燃气轮机的经济性能。本文的目的是为用户提供先前工作的总结,这些工作可以集成在一起,以提供更全面、完整的生命周期成本分析,并描述AFLCO软件中使用的框架。本文的基础技术分析可以应用于任何生命周期成本分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信