Emergency Department clinical algorithms: one academic medical centre's road to clinical excellence through collaborative practice

M. Langdorf, M. J. Burns, S. Rudkin, D. Bradley, T. Bridgeman, Marla Gain, S. Welbourne
{"title":"Emergency Department clinical algorithms: one academic medical centre's road to clinical excellence through collaborative practice","authors":"M. Langdorf, M. J. Burns, S. Rudkin, D. Bradley, T. Bridgeman, Marla Gain, S. Welbourne","doi":"10.1258/jicp.2007.007177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical pathways were first introduced into the US patient delivery system in 1988. Increased competition, high acuity, managed care and an emphasis on cost-effective quality care caused the University of California Irvine Medical Center (UCIMC) to consider the clinical path strategy of managing care. It should be noted that Executive Administrative support is necessary for the success of a programme addressing standardization of care up to, and including, the hospital Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Collaboration among departments is critical to successful pathway development and implementation. The clinical pathway programme began at UCIMC in 1999 and has resulted in the development and implementation of 21 inpatient pathways, which are measured for effectiveness quarterly. This programme has resulted in reduction in cost per discharge of 25%, with no identifiable negative quality impact. Clinical pathways had two major benefits: reduction in the practice variation and promotion of collaborative practice across medical, surgical and nursing disciplines. Due to the success of this programme, it was determined that a similar strategy would benefit the hospital’s EmergencyDepartment (ED),where, inour institution, 53% of admitted hospital patients begin their care. The ED already had a congruent goal to standardize physician and nursing practice, increase productivity and augment patient satisfaction. The Institute of Medicine, through its landmark report on errors in medicine, suggested that standardization of practice through systematic development and implementation of evidence-based clinical pathways is an effective way to reduce errors in emergency systems.","PeriodicalId":332790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care Pathways","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care Pathways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1258/jicp.2007.007177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Clinical pathways were first introduced into the US patient delivery system in 1988. Increased competition, high acuity, managed care and an emphasis on cost-effective quality care caused the University of California Irvine Medical Center (UCIMC) to consider the clinical path strategy of managing care. It should be noted that Executive Administrative support is necessary for the success of a programme addressing standardization of care up to, and including, the hospital Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Collaboration among departments is critical to successful pathway development and implementation. The clinical pathway programme began at UCIMC in 1999 and has resulted in the development and implementation of 21 inpatient pathways, which are measured for effectiveness quarterly. This programme has resulted in reduction in cost per discharge of 25%, with no identifiable negative quality impact. Clinical pathways had two major benefits: reduction in the practice variation and promotion of collaborative practice across medical, surgical and nursing disciplines. Due to the success of this programme, it was determined that a similar strategy would benefit the hospital’s EmergencyDepartment (ED),where, inour institution, 53% of admitted hospital patients begin their care. The ED already had a congruent goal to standardize physician and nursing practice, increase productivity and augment patient satisfaction. The Institute of Medicine, through its landmark report on errors in medicine, suggested that standardization of practice through systematic development and implementation of evidence-based clinical pathways is an effective way to reduce errors in emergency systems.
急诊科临床算法:一个学术医疗中心通过协作实践实现临床卓越之路
临床途径于1988年首次引入美国患者输送系统。竞争加剧、高敏锐度、管理式护理以及对成本效益高质量护理的强调,促使加州大学欧文分校医学中心(UCIMC)考虑管理护理的临床路径策略。应当指出,行政部门的行政支助对于解决护理标准化问题的方案的成功是必要的,直至并包括医院首席执行官。各部门之间的合作是成功发展和实施途径的关键。UCIMC于1999年开始实施临床途径方案,并已制定和实施了21个住院途径,每季度对其有效性进行评估。该方案使每次排放的成本降低了25%,对质量没有明显的负面影响。临床路径有两个主要的好处:减少实践变化和促进跨医学、外科和护理学科的协作实践。由于该方案的成功,确定了类似的战略将有利于医院的急诊科(ED),在我们机构中,53%的住院病人开始接受治疗。急诊科已经有了一个一致的目标,使医生和护理实践标准化,提高生产力和提高患者满意度。医学研究所通过其具有里程碑意义的医学错误报告建议,通过系统地发展和实施循证临床途径实现实践标准化是减少急诊系统错误的有效途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信