{"title":"2. The Rule of Rent: The State, Employers and the Becoming Urban Dweller in Northern Rhodesia Acting Across a Societal Field of Force, c. 1948–1962","authors":"Kirsten Rüther","doi":"10.1515/9783110601183-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urbanization means that people come to town. Their houses, all too often representing a promise rather than a materially available choice, have long become a staple of urban politics. After Northern Rhodesia had become implicated in the metropolitan war effort in the 1940s, it experienced one of the highest urbanization rates throughout the African continent. Moreover, ever since the first step of public investment in the colonies, the 1940 Colonial Development and Welfare Act, made available metropolitan loans, standards, accessibility, and politics of African housing incurred recurring debate and regulation, not only with regard to the Copperbelt region but with regard to other rapidly growing towns as well. At this time, the colonial state was fully established in Northern Rhodesia – albeit the number of expat administrators at no stage exceeded 300 persons. Even though the majority of white residents, be they from Britain, Germany, Greece, South Africa, Southern Rhodesia or other countries, did not have sustained experience in living in cities, the urbanization of Africans was frowned upon with particular suspicion by planning authorities, town clerks, district commissioners, representatives of municipal ratepayers, and town councilors officially in charge of turning the towns into livable space. While the so-called stabilization of labor became a declared aim of the time, a fundamental reservation pertained against African people’s permanent residence in towns, let alone their entitlement to active social and political participation right there. The provision of social and infrastructural amenities was imaginable and, over time, consent emerged that it","PeriodicalId":306660,"journal":{"name":"The Politics of Housing in (Post-)Colonial Africa","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Politics of Housing in (Post-)Colonial Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110601183-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Urbanization means that people come to town. Their houses, all too often representing a promise rather than a materially available choice, have long become a staple of urban politics. After Northern Rhodesia had become implicated in the metropolitan war effort in the 1940s, it experienced one of the highest urbanization rates throughout the African continent. Moreover, ever since the first step of public investment in the colonies, the 1940 Colonial Development and Welfare Act, made available metropolitan loans, standards, accessibility, and politics of African housing incurred recurring debate and regulation, not only with regard to the Copperbelt region but with regard to other rapidly growing towns as well. At this time, the colonial state was fully established in Northern Rhodesia – albeit the number of expat administrators at no stage exceeded 300 persons. Even though the majority of white residents, be they from Britain, Germany, Greece, South Africa, Southern Rhodesia or other countries, did not have sustained experience in living in cities, the urbanization of Africans was frowned upon with particular suspicion by planning authorities, town clerks, district commissioners, representatives of municipal ratepayers, and town councilors officially in charge of turning the towns into livable space. While the so-called stabilization of labor became a declared aim of the time, a fundamental reservation pertained against African people’s permanent residence in towns, let alone their entitlement to active social and political participation right there. The provision of social and infrastructural amenities was imaginable and, over time, consent emerged that it
城市化意味着人们来到城镇。他们的房子往往代表着一种承诺,而不是一种物质上的选择,长期以来一直是城市政治的主要内容。北罗得西亚在1940年代卷入都市战争之后,成为整个非洲大陆城市化率最高的国家之一。此外,自1940年《殖民地发展与福利法案》(Colonial Development and Welfare Act)对殖民地进行公共投资的第一步以来,都市贷款、标准、可及性和非洲住房的政治问题引发了反复的辩论和监管,不仅涉及铜带地区,也涉及其他快速发展的城镇。当时,在北罗得西亚完全建立了殖民国家- -尽管外籍行政人员的人数在任何阶段都没有超过300人。尽管大多数白人居民,无论他们来自英国、德国、希腊、南非、南罗得西亚还是其他国家,都没有长期在城市生活的经验,但非洲人的城市化还是受到了规划当局、城镇职员、地区专员、市政纳税人代表和正式负责将城镇改造成宜居空间的镇议员的特别怀疑。虽然所谓的劳动稳定成为当时宣布的目标,但对非洲人在城镇永久居住的基本保留,更不用说他们在那里积极参与社会和政治的权利了。社会和基础设施设施的提供是可以想象的,随着时间的推移,人们同意了这一点