Determinants of coal exit strategy in the banking industry

Benoît Jamet, Julien Bousquet, Antoine Massé
{"title":"Determinants of coal exit strategy in the banking industry","authors":"Benoît Jamet, Julien Bousquet, Antoine Massé","doi":"10.54695/bmi.172.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, an increasing number of major international banks have begun to announce their exit from the coal sector, in response to the trend initiated by public actors such as governments and related public sector financial institutions. This article examines the determinants of coal exit strategies of international banks. Using a sample of 111 banks from 31 countries and a PLSPM methodology, the results show that: 1) the announced strategies are particularly partial in nature and the financing allocated to coal firms is still high, 2) external variables (i.e., national and institutional contexts) significantly influence exit scores, notably coal dependence, progress in the energy transition and the environmental performance of the home countries, 3) with the exception of size, internal variables (e.g., exposure to the sector, risk and profitability) have no impact on coal exit scores. Banks therefore adopt a defensive strategy: the managerial decision echoes national energy and environmental policies, which underlines the crucial political and regulatory role of governments in influencing bank strategies.","PeriodicalId":142010,"journal":{"name":"Bankers, Markets & Investors","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bankers, Markets & Investors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54695/bmi.172.0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, an increasing number of major international banks have begun to announce their exit from the coal sector, in response to the trend initiated by public actors such as governments and related public sector financial institutions. This article examines the determinants of coal exit strategies of international banks. Using a sample of 111 banks from 31 countries and a PLSPM methodology, the results show that: 1) the announced strategies are particularly partial in nature and the financing allocated to coal firms is still high, 2) external variables (i.e., national and institutional contexts) significantly influence exit scores, notably coal dependence, progress in the energy transition and the environmental performance of the home countries, 3) with the exception of size, internal variables (e.g., exposure to the sector, risk and profitability) have no impact on coal exit scores. Banks therefore adopt a defensive strategy: the managerial decision echoes national energy and environmental policies, which underlines the crucial political and regulatory role of governments in influencing bank strategies.
银行业煤炭退出战略的决定因素
近年来,越来越多的大型国际银行开始宣布退出煤炭行业,以响应政府和相关公共部门金融机构等公共行为者发起的趋势。本文研究了国际银行煤炭退出战略的决定因素。利用来自31个国家111家银行的样本和PLSPM方法,结果表明:1)宣布的战略在性质上特别不全面,分配给煤炭公司的融资仍然很高;2)外部变量(即国家和制度背景)显著影响退出得分,特别是煤炭依赖、能源转型进展和本国的环境绩效;3)除规模外,内部变量(例如对该行业的敞口、风险和盈利能力)对煤炭退出得分没有影响。因此,银行采取了一种防御性战略:管理决策与国家能源和环境政策相呼应,这突显了政府在影响银行战略方面的关键政治和监管作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信