Block-based attractor coding: potential and comparison to vector quantization

T. Ramstad, S. Lepsøy
{"title":"Block-based attractor coding: potential and comparison to vector quantization","authors":"T. Ramstad, S. Lepsøy","doi":"10.1109/ACSSC.1993.342362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents a simple fractal or attractor coder model that has a very fast decoding algorithm and lends itself to comparisons with vector quantization (VQ) of the mean-gain-shape (MGSVQ) type. In fractal theory the transmission of the codebook is somewhat concealed. In our simple model the codebook is explicitly transmitted although with a double role. The main difference between MGSVQ and the fractal coder is that the codebook in MSGV is as statistically optimized from a set of training data whereas it is derived directly from the image to be coded for the fractal coder, and therefore can be viewed as adaptive. Experimental comparisons are given.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":266447,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.1993.342362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The paper presents a simple fractal or attractor coder model that has a very fast decoding algorithm and lends itself to comparisons with vector quantization (VQ) of the mean-gain-shape (MGSVQ) type. In fractal theory the transmission of the codebook is somewhat concealed. In our simple model the codebook is explicitly transmitted although with a double role. The main difference between MGSVQ and the fractal coder is that the codebook in MSGV is as statistically optimized from a set of training data whereas it is derived directly from the image to be coded for the fractal coder, and therefore can be viewed as adaptive. Experimental comparisons are given.<>
基于块的吸引子编码:潜力和矢量量化的比较
本文提出了一个简单的分形或吸引子编码器模型,该模型具有非常快的解码算法,并可与平均增益形状(MGSVQ)类型的矢量量化(VQ)进行比较。在分形理论中,密码本的传输在某种程度上是隐蔽的。在我们的简单模型中,密码本是显式传输的,尽管具有双重角色。MGSVQ和分形编码器之间的主要区别在于,MSGV中的码本是根据一组训练数据进行统计优化的,而它直接来自要为分形编码器编码的图像,因此可以视为自适应。并进行了实验比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信