Optimal placement of unified power flow controller and hybrid power flow controller using optimization technique

A. A. Bhandakkar, L. Mathew
{"title":"Optimal placement of unified power flow controller and hybrid power flow controller using optimization technique","authors":"A. A. Bhandakkar, L. Mathew","doi":"10.1109/ICPS.2018.8370001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Installing Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices in the power system is an effective alternative for utilizing transmission lines assets to their full extent. Siting of FACTS controllers at the best location in the network is a big challenge. UPFC is a very costly controller because of its configuration. A drawback of installing UPFC is that, when the transmission line with any compensating devices is planned for upgradation by UPFC installation, it does not allow to retrofit the existing devices like SVC, TCSC or even a switched capacitor. Hybrid Power Flow Controller (HPFC) which can be designed using the existing VAR compensator/ controller has the advantage that it is cost-effective and is a performance equivalent alternative of UPFC. The HPFC configuration used in this paper comprises of two VSC connected in shunt through coupling transformers, on either side of TCSC which is connected in series with the transmission line, and the two VSC share a common DC capacitor link. In this paper, optimal placement of UPFC and HPFC is obtained using Genetic Algorithm (GA) based approach. A power flow model of UPFC and HPFC are developed using constraint equations and objective functions. The results so obtained are compared and it is observed that generation cost at the optimal location of HPFC is less than that of with UPFC and total active power loss is comparable with that of UPFC. The same is compared with the uncompensated network. The technique is validated by multi-machine-9 bus system using MATLAB script file.","PeriodicalId":142445,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/IAS 54th Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/IAS 54th Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPS.2018.8370001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Installing Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices in the power system is an effective alternative for utilizing transmission lines assets to their full extent. Siting of FACTS controllers at the best location in the network is a big challenge. UPFC is a very costly controller because of its configuration. A drawback of installing UPFC is that, when the transmission line with any compensating devices is planned for upgradation by UPFC installation, it does not allow to retrofit the existing devices like SVC, TCSC or even a switched capacitor. Hybrid Power Flow Controller (HPFC) which can be designed using the existing VAR compensator/ controller has the advantage that it is cost-effective and is a performance equivalent alternative of UPFC. The HPFC configuration used in this paper comprises of two VSC connected in shunt through coupling transformers, on either side of TCSC which is connected in series with the transmission line, and the two VSC share a common DC capacitor link. In this paper, optimal placement of UPFC and HPFC is obtained using Genetic Algorithm (GA) based approach. A power flow model of UPFC and HPFC are developed using constraint equations and objective functions. The results so obtained are compared and it is observed that generation cost at the optimal location of HPFC is less than that of with UPFC and total active power loss is comparable with that of UPFC. The same is compared with the uncompensated network. The technique is validated by multi-machine-9 bus system using MATLAB script file.
采用优化技术对统一潮流控制器和混合潮流控制器进行优化布置
在电力系统中安装柔性交流输电系统(FACTS)设备是充分利用输电线路资产的有效替代方案。将FACTS控制器放置在网络中的最佳位置是一个很大的挑战。UPFC是一个非常昂贵的控制器,因为它的配置。安装UPFC的一个缺点是,当任何补偿设备的传输线计划通过安装UPFC进行升级时,它不允许改造现有的设备,如SVC, TCSC甚至开关电容器。混合功率流控制器(HPFC)可以利用现有的无功补偿器/控制器设计,具有成本效益高的优点,是UPFC的性能等效替代品。本文采用的HPFC配置包括两个VSC通过耦合变压器并联连接,分别位于与传输线串联的TCSC的两侧,两个VSC共用一个直流电容链路。本文采用基于遗传算法(GA)的方法对UPFC和HPFC进行优化布置。利用约束方程和目标函数建立了UPFC和HPFC的潮流模型。结果表明,HPFC在最优位置的发电成本小于UPFC,总有功损耗与UPFC相当。并与无补偿网络进行了比较。利用MATLAB脚本文件在多机九总线系统中对该技术进行了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信