Beyond religious freedom: Asia-Pacific engagements in conversation with Elizabeth Shakman Hurd

J. Rees, Timothy Smartt
{"title":"Beyond religious freedom: Asia-Pacific engagements in conversation with Elizabeth Shakman Hurd","authors":"J. Rees, Timothy Smartt","doi":"10.1080/20566093.2017.1396091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article frames religion as a contested category in the study of political practice and serves as an introduction to a special issue of the JRPP that interrogates the politics of religious freedom in contexts of the Asia-Pacific. Mavelli and Petito’s depiction of two modes of postsecularism (2012) – summarised as the mode of religious resilience and the mode of radical critique – allows further consideration of contrasting assumptions shaping current debates about religion and politics. We suggest that the recent and influential scholarship of Elizabeth Shakman Hurd can be aligned with the mode of radical critique, noting the influence of Beyond Religious Freedom (2015) as establishing a platform for further critical studies of the political use of religion in diverse global contexts. New essays drawn from settings across the Asia-Pacific – Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Australia, United States, East Asia – are situated within this broader discourse and in conversation with Hurd’s work. In addition, the inclusion of perspectives that instantiate the mode of religious resilience reestablish the interlocution between the two modes of postsecularism and the contested nature of religion as a category of political practice research.","PeriodicalId":252085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious and Political Practice","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religious and Political Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20566093.2017.1396091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article frames religion as a contested category in the study of political practice and serves as an introduction to a special issue of the JRPP that interrogates the politics of religious freedom in contexts of the Asia-Pacific. Mavelli and Petito’s depiction of two modes of postsecularism (2012) – summarised as the mode of religious resilience and the mode of radical critique – allows further consideration of contrasting assumptions shaping current debates about religion and politics. We suggest that the recent and influential scholarship of Elizabeth Shakman Hurd can be aligned with the mode of radical critique, noting the influence of Beyond Religious Freedom (2015) as establishing a platform for further critical studies of the political use of religion in diverse global contexts. New essays drawn from settings across the Asia-Pacific – Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Australia, United States, East Asia – are situated within this broader discourse and in conversation with Hurd’s work. In addition, the inclusion of perspectives that instantiate the mode of religious resilience reestablish the interlocution between the two modes of postsecularism and the contested nature of religion as a category of political practice research.
超越宗教自由:与伊丽莎白·沙克曼·赫德对话的亚太事务
本文将宗教作为政治实践研究中的一个有争议的类别,并作为JRPP的一个特刊的介绍,该特刊对亚太地区背景下的宗教自由政治进行了质疑。马维利和佩蒂托对两种后世俗主义模式的描述(2012)——概括为宗教弹性模式和激进批判模式——允许进一步考虑形成当前关于宗教和政治辩论的对比假设。我们建议Elizabeth Shakman Hurd最近的有影响力的学术研究可以与激进批判模式保持一致,并指出超越宗教自由(2015)的影响为进一步在不同的全球背景下对宗教的政治用途进行批判性研究建立了一个平台。来自亚太地区——马来西亚、斯里兰卡、缅甸、澳大利亚、美国、东亚——的新文章被置于这一更广泛的话语中,并与赫德的作品进行了对话。此外,纳入实例化宗教弹性模式的观点,重新建立了后世俗主义两种模式之间的对话,以及宗教作为政治实践研究类别的争议性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信