Medical Student's Perception And Preferences About Peer Physical Examination (PPE)

H. Manjunath, D. Venkatesh, H. TaklikarR, V. Vijayanath
{"title":"Medical Student's Perception And Preferences About Peer Physical Examination (PPE)","authors":"H. Manjunath, D. Venkatesh, H. TaklikarR, V. Vijayanath","doi":"10.15419/AJHS.V2I1.423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is greater emphasis on clinically oriented teaching and early clinical exposure for medical students. There is limitation to practice and perfect the skills on sick patients. Hence, standardized patients are used for practice of clinical skills. However non-availability of trained standardized patients, high cost of employing them poses a challenge to training medical students. The viable alternative is to use the peers for skill training. It can be a potential area of student discomfort or inappropriate behavior by classmates or tutors. Present study assesses the attitude of students towards Peer Physical Examination (PPE). Fifty three third term medical students (23 males and 30 females) were administered a structured and validated questionnaire with 15 questions to assess elements of comfort, professionalism, appropriateness and value of PPE. Students responded to questions using a five-point Likert scale, where 1 = strongly agree, and 5 = strongly disagree.The pattern of response was similar for male and female students. 81.82% were comfortable with PPE for practice of clinical skills. 32.90% were comfortable examining peers of opposite sex. 18.04% felt it was appropriate to perform breast, genital and rectal examinations on peers. 2.17% agreed to volunteer for such examination.Majority of students preferred PPE to standardized patients for practice of clinical skills. PPE was preferred as it provided valuable feedback, better learning experience, and felt examining classmates was comfortable & appropriate. However they felt inappropriate to volunteer or examine breast, inguinal, genital regions of classmate as a part of PPE.","PeriodicalId":214238,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15419/AJHS.V2I1.423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is greater emphasis on clinically oriented teaching and early clinical exposure for medical students. There is limitation to practice and perfect the skills on sick patients. Hence, standardized patients are used for practice of clinical skills. However non-availability of trained standardized patients, high cost of employing them poses a challenge to training medical students. The viable alternative is to use the peers for skill training. It can be a potential area of student discomfort or inappropriate behavior by classmates or tutors. Present study assesses the attitude of students towards Peer Physical Examination (PPE). Fifty three third term medical students (23 males and 30 females) were administered a structured and validated questionnaire with 15 questions to assess elements of comfort, professionalism, appropriateness and value of PPE. Students responded to questions using a five-point Likert scale, where 1 = strongly agree, and 5 = strongly disagree.The pattern of response was similar for male and female students. 81.82% were comfortable with PPE for practice of clinical skills. 32.90% were comfortable examining peers of opposite sex. 18.04% felt it was appropriate to perform breast, genital and rectal examinations on peers. 2.17% agreed to volunteer for such examination.Majority of students preferred PPE to standardized patients for practice of clinical skills. PPE was preferred as it provided valuable feedback, better learning experience, and felt examining classmates was comfortable & appropriate. However they felt inappropriate to volunteer or examine breast, inguinal, genital regions of classmate as a part of PPE.
更强调临床导向的教学和医学生的早期临床接触。在病人身上练习和完善技能是有局限性的。因此,标准化的病人被用于临床技能的实践。然而,缺乏训练有素的标准化病人,雇用他们的高成本对培养医学生提出了挑战。可行的替代方案是利用同伴进行技能培训。这可能是学生不适或同学或导师不当行为的潜在领域。本研究评估学生对同伴体格检查的态度。对53名三年级医学生(男23名,女30名)进行了一份包含15个问题的结构化和有效问卷调查,以评估个人防护用品的舒适度、专业性、适当性和价值。学生们用李克特五分制回答问题,1 =非常同意,5 =非常不同意。男女学生的反应模式相似。81.82%的人对临床技能实践的PPE感到满意。32.90%的人在检查异性同伴时感到自在。18.04%的人认为对同龄人进行乳房、生殖器和直肠检查是合适的。2.17%同意自愿接受此类检查。大多数学生更喜欢PPE,而不是标准化患者,以实践临床技能。首选PPE,因为它提供了宝贵的反馈,更好的学习体验,并且感觉检查同学是舒适和适当的。然而,他们认为自愿或检查乳房、腹股沟、生殖器区域作为PPE的一部分是不合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信