Design Education and Engineering Design

Kyoung-Yun Kim, G. Kremer, L. Schmidt
{"title":"Design Education and Engineering Design","authors":"Kyoung-Yun Kim, G. Kremer, L. Schmidt","doi":"10.3233/jid-2017-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engineering design has been a focus of study not only due to its practical importance for the engineering and technology development domains, but also due to its rich setting that naturally supports cognitive and behavioral investigations of designing, learning, and teaming. It mostly involves ill-structured problem solving, which makes the act of designing and design education complex. This problem context often includes fundamental design, customization, personalization, and domain specific engineering issues. The multi-stage problem solving skills, for example, can be enhanced by integrating real-world problems to the design problem context – an aspect that also brings ill-structuredness. Given the importance of engineering design, scholars from both engineering design and science of problem solving domains, and indeed many others such as education, psychology, mechanical engineering, business, artificial intelligence, contributed to the state-of-the-art on this focus. To name a many approaches based on various education theories, project-based learning inquiry-based learning discovery constructivism and constructionism studied to increase our deep understanding of learners in design education domains. These approaches often consider individual and group design activities. Yet, there are aspects of designing that are still difficult to replicate in laboratory conditions and practice in classroom settings. This special includes five articles that broaden our understanding of how design education can be redesigned with instructional design principles and exemplify the role of education design to advance design education. The articles present recent research advances on learning technology and pedagogical experiments informed by theories of learning","PeriodicalId":342559,"journal":{"name":"J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci.","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-2017-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Engineering design has been a focus of study not only due to its practical importance for the engineering and technology development domains, but also due to its rich setting that naturally supports cognitive and behavioral investigations of designing, learning, and teaming. It mostly involves ill-structured problem solving, which makes the act of designing and design education complex. This problem context often includes fundamental design, customization, personalization, and domain specific engineering issues. The multi-stage problem solving skills, for example, can be enhanced by integrating real-world problems to the design problem context – an aspect that also brings ill-structuredness. Given the importance of engineering design, scholars from both engineering design and science of problem solving domains, and indeed many others such as education, psychology, mechanical engineering, business, artificial intelligence, contributed to the state-of-the-art on this focus. To name a many approaches based on various education theories, project-based learning inquiry-based learning discovery constructivism and constructionism studied to increase our deep understanding of learners in design education domains. These approaches often consider individual and group design activities. Yet, there are aspects of designing that are still difficult to replicate in laboratory conditions and practice in classroom settings. This special includes five articles that broaden our understanding of how design education can be redesigned with instructional design principles and exemplify the role of education design to advance design education. The articles present recent research advances on learning technology and pedagogical experiments informed by theories of learning
设计教育与工程设计“,
工程设计一直是研究的焦点,不仅因为它在工程和技术发展领域的实际重要性,而且还因为它丰富的环境,自然地支持设计,学习和团队的认知和行为研究。它主要涉及结构不良的问题解决,这使得设计行为和设计教育变得复杂。这个问题上下文通常包括基本设计、定制、个性化和领域特定的工程问题。例如,多阶段解决问题的技能可以通过将现实世界的问题整合到设计问题环境中来增强——这方面也会带来结构不良。鉴于工程设计的重要性,来自工程设计和问题解决科学领域的学者,以及许多其他领域,如教育、心理学、机械工程、商业、人工智能,都在这一领域做出了最先进的贡献。以各种教育理论为基础的学习方法为例,以项目为基础的学习,以探究为基础的学习,以发现为基础的学习,建构主义和建构主义的研究增加了我们对设计教育领域学习者的深刻理解。这些方法通常考虑个人和团体设计活动。然而,设计的某些方面仍然难以在实验室条件和课堂环境中复制。本特刊包括五篇文章,拓宽了我们对如何用教学设计原则重新设计设计教育的理解,并举例说明了教育设计在推动设计教育方面的作用。文章介绍了学习理论在学习技术和教学实验方面的最新研究进展
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信