Fraud Detection Using Random Forest Classifier, Logistic Regression, and Gradient Boosting Classifier Algorithms on Credit Cards

Muhamad Sopiyan, Fauziah Fauziah, Yunan Fauzi Wijaya
{"title":"Fraud Detection Using Random Forest Classifier, Logistic Regression, and Gradient Boosting Classifier Algorithms on Credit Cards","authors":"Muhamad Sopiyan, Fauziah Fauziah, Yunan Fauzi Wijaya","doi":"10.30595/juita.v10i1.12050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following credit card records were used in this study of 284.807 transactions made by credit card holders in Europe for two days from the Kaggle dataset. This is a very poor data set, having 492 transactions, an imbalance of only 0.172% of the 284.807 transactions. The purpose of this study is to obtain the best model and then simulate it by electronically detecting unauthorized financial transactions in bank payment systems. The dataset for this study is unbalanced class data with 99.80% for the major class and 0.2% for the minor class. This type of class-imbalanced data problem is solved by applying method a combination of minority oversampling techniques using Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE). To determine the most appropriate and accurate classification in solving class balance problems, comparisons were made with the Random Forest Classifier (RFC), Logistic Regression (LGR), and Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC) algorithms. The test results in this study are the Random Forest Classifier (RFC) algorithm is better than other algorithms because it has the highest accuracy the percentage of data-train is 100% and data-test is 99.99% and the evaluation of the AUC score as a result of algorithm testing is 0.9999.","PeriodicalId":174460,"journal":{"name":"JUITA: Jurnal Informatika","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JUITA: Jurnal Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v10i1.12050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The following credit card records were used in this study of 284.807 transactions made by credit card holders in Europe for two days from the Kaggle dataset. This is a very poor data set, having 492 transactions, an imbalance of only 0.172% of the 284.807 transactions. The purpose of this study is to obtain the best model and then simulate it by electronically detecting unauthorized financial transactions in bank payment systems. The dataset for this study is unbalanced class data with 99.80% for the major class and 0.2% for the minor class. This type of class-imbalanced data problem is solved by applying method a combination of minority oversampling techniques using Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE). To determine the most appropriate and accurate classification in solving class balance problems, comparisons were made with the Random Forest Classifier (RFC), Logistic Regression (LGR), and Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC) algorithms. The test results in this study are the Random Forest Classifier (RFC) algorithm is better than other algorithms because it has the highest accuracy the percentage of data-train is 100% and data-test is 99.99% and the evaluation of the AUC score as a result of algorithm testing is 0.9999.
信用卡欺诈检测使用随机森林分类器、逻辑回归和梯度增强分类器算法
在这项研究中,使用了来自Kaggle数据集的欧洲信用卡持卡人在两天内进行的284.807笔交易的信用卡记录。这是一个非常糟糕的数据集,有492个事务,不平衡性仅为284.807个事务的0.172%。本研究的目的是获得最佳模型,然后通过电子检测银行支付系统中未经授权的金融交易来模拟它。本研究的数据集是不平衡类数据,主要类占99.80%,次要类占0.2%。采用综合少数过采样技术(SMOTE)结合少数过采样技术的方法解决了这类数据不平衡问题。为了确定在解决类平衡问题时最合适和最准确的分类,我们与随机森林分类器(RFC)、逻辑回归(LGR)和梯度增强分类器(GBC)算法进行了比较。本研究的测试结果是随机森林分类器(Random Forest Classifier, RFC)算法的准确率最高,data-train的百分比为100%,data-test的百分比为99.99%,算法测试结果的AUC分数评价为0.9999,优于其他算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信