Effective Remote Human Factors Support During COVID-19: Challenges and Lessons Learned

Anthony Soung Yee, Carleene Bañez, S. Gelmi, C. Gaulton, Trevor N. T. Hall
{"title":"Effective Remote Human Factors Support During COVID-19: Challenges and Lessons Learned","authors":"Anthony Soung Yee, Carleene Bañez, S. Gelmi, C. Gaulton, Trevor N. T. Hall","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1002116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As with many aspects of our personal and professional lives, the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the way that human factors researchers and specialists are able to conduct their work. As an organization providing human factors, patient safety, and risk management support nationally to healthcare institutions, we have had to adapt our established processes to find innovative solutions to continue our research and our work. Namely, we have had to work remotely from our partners and collaborators, which severely restricts opportunities for field work and first-hand observations. Besides the obvious challenges with technology and connectivity issues, we had to be mindful of our stakeholders and participants knowing that ‘Zoom fatigue’ was and continues to impact individuals both mentally and physically. As well, as practitioners we feel restricted in building a rapport with various end users, which is an essential component for understanding the stakeholder needs. In this talk, we present a number of strategies and best practices, including the use of electronic tools and tips for engagement and collaboration during virtual sessions. As well, we highlight the new opportunities that remote work affords the human factors specialist.We present these techniques within the context of patient safety projects conducted over the past year. In 2021, we partnered with a healthcare delivery institution to conduct a virtual Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). The FMEA was conducted remotely via Zoom with five two-hour sessions, as physical distancing rules were in effect. In order to balance time commitments and Zoom fatigue, two-hour sessions were found to be sufficient for productive discussions while also respecting stakeholders’ schedules and care responsibilities. Furthermore, we decided on a dedicated facilitator to avoid cognitive overload and to avoid having to time-share between a number of responsibilities at the expense of a productive conversation. In the full talk, we discuss a number of other strategies on using technological aids to facilitate discussion, maintaining an amicable and open work environment, and staying on schedule. As well, we discuss the opportunities afforded by remote work, such as being able to provide support to a large number of organizations across the country without the overhead of travel.We anticipate that hybrid and remote work will continue to be part of the work reality for human factors specialists in healthcare for the foreseeable future. We have adopted these techniques into our standard practice, and believe that human factors practitioners will value hearing details about conducting these sessions in a remote setting. In particular, we provide lessons learned for scheduling and preparing for the sessions, collecting user data using a web-based voting system, and the challenges of logistics of running remote sessions. These will be practical and useful for specialists and researchers planning to conduct remote sessions with healthcare providers.","PeriodicalId":389399,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare and Medical Devices","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare and Medical Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As with many aspects of our personal and professional lives, the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the way that human factors researchers and specialists are able to conduct their work. As an organization providing human factors, patient safety, and risk management support nationally to healthcare institutions, we have had to adapt our established processes to find innovative solutions to continue our research and our work. Namely, we have had to work remotely from our partners and collaborators, which severely restricts opportunities for field work and first-hand observations. Besides the obvious challenges with technology and connectivity issues, we had to be mindful of our stakeholders and participants knowing that ‘Zoom fatigue’ was and continues to impact individuals both mentally and physically. As well, as practitioners we feel restricted in building a rapport with various end users, which is an essential component for understanding the stakeholder needs. In this talk, we present a number of strategies and best practices, including the use of electronic tools and tips for engagement and collaboration during virtual sessions. As well, we highlight the new opportunities that remote work affords the human factors specialist.We present these techniques within the context of patient safety projects conducted over the past year. In 2021, we partnered with a healthcare delivery institution to conduct a virtual Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). The FMEA was conducted remotely via Zoom with five two-hour sessions, as physical distancing rules were in effect. In order to balance time commitments and Zoom fatigue, two-hour sessions were found to be sufficient for productive discussions while also respecting stakeholders’ schedules and care responsibilities. Furthermore, we decided on a dedicated facilitator to avoid cognitive overload and to avoid having to time-share between a number of responsibilities at the expense of a productive conversation. In the full talk, we discuss a number of other strategies on using technological aids to facilitate discussion, maintaining an amicable and open work environment, and staying on schedule. As well, we discuss the opportunities afforded by remote work, such as being able to provide support to a large number of organizations across the country without the overhead of travel.We anticipate that hybrid and remote work will continue to be part of the work reality for human factors specialists in healthcare for the foreseeable future. We have adopted these techniques into our standard practice, and believe that human factors practitioners will value hearing details about conducting these sessions in a remote setting. In particular, we provide lessons learned for scheduling and preparing for the sessions, collecting user data using a web-based voting system, and the challenges of logistics of running remote sessions. These will be practical and useful for specialists and researchers planning to conduct remote sessions with healthcare providers.
COVID-19期间有效的远程人为因素支持:挑战和经验教训
与我们个人和职业生活的许多方面一样,2019冠状病毒病大流行影响了人为因素研究人员和专家开展工作的方式。作为一家在全国范围内为医疗机构提供人为因素、患者安全和风险管理支持的组织,我们必须调整我们已建立的流程,寻找创新的解决方案,以继续我们的研究和工作。也就是说,我们不得不与我们的伙伴和合作者进行远程工作,这严重限制了实地工作和第一手观察的机会。除了技术和连接问题方面的明显挑战外,我们还必须注意我们的利益相关者和参与者,他们知道“Zoom疲劳”已经并将继续影响个人的精神和身体。同样,作为从业者,我们在与各种最终用户建立融洽关系方面感到受到限制,这是理解涉众需求的重要组成部分。在这次演讲中,我们将介绍一些策略和最佳实践,包括在虚拟会议期间使用电子工具和参与和协作的技巧。此外,我们还强调了远程工作为人为因素专家提供的新机会。我们在过去一年中进行的患者安全项目的背景下介绍这些技术。2021年,我们与一家医疗保健服务机构合作,开展虚拟故障模式和影响分析(FMEA)。由于物理距离规则生效,FMEA通过Zoom远程进行了五个两小时的会议。为了平衡时间承诺和Zoom疲劳,两个小时的会议被发现足以进行富有成效的讨论,同时也尊重利益相关者的时间表和照顾责任。此外,我们决定聘请一位专门的协调人,以避免认知超载,并避免以牺牲富有成效的对话为代价,在多个职责之间分担时间。在完整的演讲中,我们讨论了一些其他的策略,利用科技辅助来促进讨论,保持一个友好和开放的工作环境,并保持进度。此外,我们还讨论了远程工作提供的机会,例如能够在没有旅行开销的情况下为全国各地的大量组织提供支持。我们预计,在可预见的未来,混合和远程工作将继续成为医疗保健领域人为因素专家工作现实的一部分。我们已经将这些技术应用到我们的标准实践中,并相信人为因素从业者会重视在远程环境中听取有关进行这些会议的细节。特别地,我们提供了安排和准备会议的经验教训,使用基于web的投票系统收集用户数据,以及运行远程会议的后勤挑战。对于计划与医疗保健提供者进行远程会议的专家和研究人员来说,这将是实用和有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信