I. Lee, Seung Ah Lee, Joon Jeong, Byeong-Woo Park, W. Jung, S. Hong, K. Oh, Y. H. Ryu, H. Lee
{"title":"Predicting the Status of the Nonsentinel Lymph Nodes in early Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes","authors":"I. Lee, Seung Ah Lee, Joon Jeong, Byeong-Woo Park, W. Jung, S. Hong, K. Oh, Y. H. Ryu, H. Lee","doi":"10.4048/JKBCS.2004.7.4.268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The need for completion axillary lymph node dissection, even in early breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node, has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that predict the presence of metastasis in non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs) when the sentinel lymph node (SLN) was positive. Methods: Between December 1998 and June 2004, the records of 104 early breast cancer patients with a positive SLN and who underwent completion axillary lymph node dissection were reviewed. The clinicopathological features in SLN-positive patients were evaluated as possible predictors of metastatic NSLN. Results: Forty four (42.3%) of the 104 patients with positive SLN had metastatic NSLNs. In a univariate analysis, unicentric multifocality (P=0.016), lymphovascular invasion (P=0.006) and SLN metastasis larger than 2 mm (P= 0.003) were associated with positive NSLN findings. The number of SLNs removed was significantly associated as a negative predictor (P=0.043). A multivariate analysis revealed that SLN metastasis >2 mm (P=0.021) and lymphovascular invasion (P=0.040) were independent predictors of metastatic NSLN. Conclusion: The likelihood of metastatic NSLNs correlates with the size of the largest SLN metastasis and the presence of lymphovascular invasion of the primary tumor. Even though in early breast cancer with positive SLNs, incorporating these factors may help determining which patients would benefit from additional axillary lymph node dissection. (Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society 2004;7:268-274)","PeriodicalId":414717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4048/JKBCS.2004.7.4.268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Purpose: The need for completion axillary lymph node dissection, even in early breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node, has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that predict the presence of metastasis in non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs) when the sentinel lymph node (SLN) was positive. Methods: Between December 1998 and June 2004, the records of 104 early breast cancer patients with a positive SLN and who underwent completion axillary lymph node dissection were reviewed. The clinicopathological features in SLN-positive patients were evaluated as possible predictors of metastatic NSLN. Results: Forty four (42.3%) of the 104 patients with positive SLN had metastatic NSLNs. In a univariate analysis, unicentric multifocality (P=0.016), lymphovascular invasion (P=0.006) and SLN metastasis larger than 2 mm (P= 0.003) were associated with positive NSLN findings. The number of SLNs removed was significantly associated as a negative predictor (P=0.043). A multivariate analysis revealed that SLN metastasis >2 mm (P=0.021) and lymphovascular invasion (P=0.040) were independent predictors of metastatic NSLN. Conclusion: The likelihood of metastatic NSLNs correlates with the size of the largest SLN metastasis and the presence of lymphovascular invasion of the primary tumor. Even though in early breast cancer with positive SLNs, incorporating these factors may help determining which patients would benefit from additional axillary lymph node dissection. (Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society 2004;7:268-274)
目的:即使在前哨淋巴结阳性的早期乳腺癌患者中,是否需要完全性腋窝淋巴结清扫一直受到质疑。本研究的目的是确定当前哨淋巴结(SLN)阳性时,预测非前哨淋巴结(nsln)转移存在的因素。方法:回顾性分析1998年12月至2004年6月间104例SLN阳性的早期乳腺癌患者行完全性腋窝淋巴结清扫术。评估sln阳性患者的临床病理特征作为转移性NSLN的可能预测因素。结果:104例SLN阳性患者中44例(42.3%)为转移性nsln。在单变量分析中,单中心多灶性(P=0.016)、淋巴血管浸润(P=0.006)和SLN转移大于2 mm (P= 0.003)与NSLN阳性结果相关。sln切除数量作为负向预测因子显著相关(P=0.043)。多因素分析显示,SLN转移>2 mm (P=0.021)和淋巴血管浸润(P=0.040)是转移性NSLN的独立预测因素。结论:nsln转移的可能性与最大的SLN转移的大小和原发肿瘤是否存在淋巴血管浸润有关。即使在sln阳性的早期乳腺癌中,结合这些因素可能有助于确定哪些患者将受益于额外的腋窝淋巴结清扫。(韩国乳腺癌协会杂志2004;7:268-274)