Stakeholder knowledge and perceptions of the circular economy in Ugandan cities

Tom Geme, E. Nijman, E. B. Ntawuhiganayo, Doryn Negesa
{"title":"Stakeholder knowledge and perceptions of the circular economy in Ugandan cities","authors":"Tom Geme, E. Nijman, E. B. Ntawuhiganayo, Doryn Negesa","doi":"10.3389/frsus.2023.1117814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transitioning to a circular economy (CE) has been touted as the necessary paradigm shift to counterbalance the ever-increasing socio-economic metabolism in the face of global challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, population growth, pollution, and unemployment. Previous research has indicated that the transition to CE requires stakeholder collaboration. Yet, at present, a dearth of literature exists about stakeholder knowledge and perceptions of CE, more so in Africa. This begs the question; how will stakeholders collaborate when their understanding on the subject is dissimilar? To contribute to closing this knowledge gap, this research employs a mixed-methods approach to investigate the knowledge and perception of CE among key stakeholders in selected cities in Uganda. Interview data from 230 respondents selected via a snowballing process in the Ugandan cities of Gulu, Jinja, Masaka, Mbale, Mbarara and the Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area indicate that several stakeholder groups are involved in Uganda's CE space. These include government, businesses, civil society, the public as well as academia, research and think tanks. In terms of CE knowledge, the findings show that respondents were generally knowledgeable about CE. However, much of the knowledge is about the 3Rs (reduce, repair, and recycle) and waste management to the point that many respondents misconstrued recycling to be synonymous with CE. Overall, participant knowledge and perception of CE are determined by the level of education, sector of operation, position at the workplace, how long one has been in the CE space and whether one participated in decision-making. The findings indicate that respondents believe that the government had not done enough in promoting CE concepts and practices including creating avenues for stakeholder collaboration. The findings offer insights for CE proponents on attributes to consider when advocating and communicating about CE. This research could also inform the formulation of policies that stimulate CE development particularly with determining entry points for CE interventions and effective stakeholder engagement.","PeriodicalId":253319,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainability","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1117814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Transitioning to a circular economy (CE) has been touted as the necessary paradigm shift to counterbalance the ever-increasing socio-economic metabolism in the face of global challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, population growth, pollution, and unemployment. Previous research has indicated that the transition to CE requires stakeholder collaboration. Yet, at present, a dearth of literature exists about stakeholder knowledge and perceptions of CE, more so in Africa. This begs the question; how will stakeholders collaborate when their understanding on the subject is dissimilar? To contribute to closing this knowledge gap, this research employs a mixed-methods approach to investigate the knowledge and perception of CE among key stakeholders in selected cities in Uganda. Interview data from 230 respondents selected via a snowballing process in the Ugandan cities of Gulu, Jinja, Masaka, Mbale, Mbarara and the Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area indicate that several stakeholder groups are involved in Uganda's CE space. These include government, businesses, civil society, the public as well as academia, research and think tanks. In terms of CE knowledge, the findings show that respondents were generally knowledgeable about CE. However, much of the knowledge is about the 3Rs (reduce, repair, and recycle) and waste management to the point that many respondents misconstrued recycling to be synonymous with CE. Overall, participant knowledge and perception of CE are determined by the level of education, sector of operation, position at the workplace, how long one has been in the CE space and whether one participated in decision-making. The findings indicate that respondents believe that the government had not done enough in promoting CE concepts and practices including creating avenues for stakeholder collaboration. The findings offer insights for CE proponents on attributes to consider when advocating and communicating about CE. This research could also inform the formulation of policies that stimulate CE development particularly with determining entry points for CE interventions and effective stakeholder engagement.
利益相关者对乌干达城市循环经济的认识和看法
在气候变化、生物多样性丧失、人口增长、污染和失业等全球挑战面前,向循环经济(CE)过渡被吹捧为平衡日益增长的社会经济代谢的必要范式转变。先前的研究表明,向CE的过渡需要利益相关者的合作。然而,目前,缺乏关于利益相关者的知识和认知的文献,在非洲更是如此。这就引出了一个问题;当利益相关者对主题的理解不同时,他们将如何合作?为了缩小这一知识差距,本研究采用混合方法调查乌干达选定城市的主要利益相关者对环境保护的知识和看法。在乌干达的古卢、金贾、马萨卡、姆巴莱、姆巴拉拉和大坎帕拉都市圈等城市,通过滚雪球式过程选出230名受访者的访谈数据表明,乌干达的电子商务领域涉及多个利益相关者团体。这些机构包括政府、企业、民间社会、公众以及学术界、研究机构和智库。在环保知识方面,调查结果显示,受访者普遍对环保知识有所了解。然而,大部分知识都是关于3r(减少、修复和回收)和废物管理的,以至于许多受访者错误地将回收与CE等同起来。整体而言,受访者对行政长官的认识和看法,是由教育程度、所属行业、工作职位、在行政长官领域工作的时间,以及是否参与决策所决定。调查结果显示,受访者认为政府在推广环保概念和实践方面做得不够,包括为利益相关者合作创造途径。研究结果为倡导和传播CE时需要考虑的属性提供了见解。这项研究还可以为政策的制定提供信息,以刺激行政教育的发展,特别是确定行政教育干预的切入点和有效的利益相关者参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信