This Show Was Religious?!: Online Reactions to Religion in Lost and Battlestar Galactica Finales

C. Howell
{"title":"This Show Was Religious?!: Online Reactions to Religion in Lost and Battlestar Galactica Finales","authors":"C. Howell","doi":"10.1163/21659214-90000083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the American populace is increasingly identifying as non-religious, religious representation is surprisingly also increasing on television, leading many to discuss the limits and boundaries of acceptable representations of religion through the cultural forum of television. The series finales of Lost and Battlestar Galactica serve as a particular pair of case studies I place in discussion with each other about religious-representational and generic concerns. Online reactions in discussion forums or comment sections to the religious elements in these finales generally occur in one of two ways: negative reactions that set the religious endings in opposition to the genre expectations viewers had for the shows or generally positive reactions that focus on the religious themes as successful affective tools that provided adequate or at least justified narrative closure. In both discursive strains, the tone was overwhelmingly respectful and occasionally aware that those entering into the discussions were engaging in larger cultural debates, providing one site of exploring the changing role of religion in popular television through a study of expectations of science fiction narratives and their conclusions.","PeriodicalId":142820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-90000083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As the American populace is increasingly identifying as non-religious, religious representation is surprisingly also increasing on television, leading many to discuss the limits and boundaries of acceptable representations of religion through the cultural forum of television. The series finales of Lost and Battlestar Galactica serve as a particular pair of case studies I place in discussion with each other about religious-representational and generic concerns. Online reactions in discussion forums or comment sections to the religious elements in these finales generally occur in one of two ways: negative reactions that set the religious endings in opposition to the genre expectations viewers had for the shows or generally positive reactions that focus on the religious themes as successful affective tools that provided adequate or at least justified narrative closure. In both discursive strains, the tone was overwhelmingly respectful and occasionally aware that those entering into the discussions were engaging in larger cultural debates, providing one site of exploring the changing role of religion in popular television through a study of expectations of science fiction narratives and their conclusions.
这个节目是宗教的?!:《迷失》和《太空堡垒卡拉狄加》结局中对宗教的在线反应
随着美国民众越来越多地认为自己不信教,电视上的宗教表现也令人惊讶地增加,这导致许多人通过电视这个文化论坛来讨论宗教表现的可接受范围和界限。《迷失》和《太空堡垒卡拉狄加》的系列结局是我在讨论宗教代表性和普遍性问题时所举的两个特别案例。在线论坛或评论区对这些大结局中宗教元素的反应通常有两种:一种是负面反应,将宗教结局与观众对剧集的类型期望相对立;另一种是正面反应,将宗教主题作为成功的情感工具,提供了足够的或至少合理的叙事结局。在这两种话语风格中,语气都非常尊重,偶尔也会意识到参与讨论的人正在参与更大的文化辩论,通过对科幻小说叙事及其结论的期望的研究,为探索流行电视中宗教角色的变化提供了一个场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信