Analysis of Domestic versus Foreign Banks Efficiency in Pakistan

M. Afzal, Shelah Ejaz, Shoaib Ahmad
{"title":"Analysis of Domestic versus Foreign Banks Efficiency in Pakistan","authors":"M. Afzal, Shelah Ejaz, Shoaib Ahmad","doi":"10.20448/JOURNAL.501.2019.61.36.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Banking sector reforms were introduced in 1972 in the light of many contemporary issues observed in the banking industry. The nationalization of banks in 1974 improved the financial ӏ sector in many ways. The efficiency of the sector was compromised due to political ӏ influence; over-branching and overstaffing that affected the banking industry. In 1990s many reforms were made in the banking sector to address the problems that existed in the nationalized banking system. The public sector’s ownership of commercial banks had created lot of problems (political intervention in credit allocation, loan recovery and deterioration in services quality). This study evaluated the efficiency of domestic and foreign banks for the period 2010-2016. DEA was used to explore the scale, technical, pure technical and scale efficiency of the domestic and foreign banks. The ӏ east efficient banks are Bank Alfalah, Nationa ӏ Bank, Askari Bank and Standard chartered in terms of scale efficiency. Technical ӏ efficiency scores demonstrate that A ӏӏ ied Bank, Askari bank, National ӏ Bank, Standard Chartered Bank and Bank Alfalah did not perform efficiently whereas other banks of the sample did well. Pure technical ӏ efficiency scores under both orientations reveal that in 2010 and 2015, a ӏӏ banks showed a perfect pure technical ӏ efficiency score of 1.00. Both domestic and foreign banks performance is mixed. Domestic banks are not less efficient in terms of all efficiencies than foreign banks. Both banks need attention to managerial ӏ aspects and efficient utilization of technology in their operations. Sound macroeconomic policies may also help in improving the efficiency of banks.","PeriodicalId":360581,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.501.2019.61.36.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Banking sector reforms were introduced in 1972 in the light of many contemporary issues observed in the banking industry. The nationalization of banks in 1974 improved the financial ӏ sector in many ways. The efficiency of the sector was compromised due to political ӏ influence; over-branching and overstaffing that affected the banking industry. In 1990s many reforms were made in the banking sector to address the problems that existed in the nationalized banking system. The public sector’s ownership of commercial banks had created lot of problems (political intervention in credit allocation, loan recovery and deterioration in services quality). This study evaluated the efficiency of domestic and foreign banks for the period 2010-2016. DEA was used to explore the scale, technical, pure technical and scale efficiency of the domestic and foreign banks. The ӏ east efficient banks are Bank Alfalah, Nationa ӏ Bank, Askari Bank and Standard chartered in terms of scale efficiency. Technical ӏ efficiency scores demonstrate that A ӏӏ ied Bank, Askari bank, National ӏ Bank, Standard Chartered Bank and Bank Alfalah did not perform efficiently whereas other banks of the sample did well. Pure technical ӏ efficiency scores under both orientations reveal that in 2010 and 2015, a ӏӏ banks showed a perfect pure technical ӏ efficiency score of 1.00. Both domestic and foreign banks performance is mixed. Domestic banks are not less efficient in terms of all efficiencies than foreign banks. Both banks need attention to managerial ӏ aspects and efficient utilization of technology in their operations. Sound macroeconomic policies may also help in improving the efficiency of banks.
巴基斯坦内外资银行效率分析
鉴于银行业中观察到的许多当代问题,1972年引入了银行业改革。1974年银行国有化在许多方面改善了金融部门。由于政治影响,该部门的效率受到损害;分支机构过多和人员过多影响了银行业。在20世纪90年代,银行部门进行了许多改革,以解决国有化银行体系中存在的问题。公共部门对商业银行的所有权造成了许多问题(政治干预信贷分配、贷款回收和服务质量恶化)。本研究评估了2010-2016年期间国内外银行的效率。采用DEA对国内外银行的规模、技术效率、纯技术效率和规模效率进行了探讨。在规模效率方面,效率最高的银行是阿拉法拉银行、国民银行、阿斯卡利银行和渣打银行。技术效率分数表明,A ӏӏ ied银行,Askari银行,National银行,渣打银行和Alfalah银行表现不佳,而样本中的其他银行表现良好。两个方向下的纯技术效率得分显示,2010年和2015年,一家ӏӏ银行的纯技术效率得分为1.00。国内外银行的表现好坏参半。就所有效率而言,国内银行的效率并不低于外资银行。两家银行都需要注意管理方面和在业务中有效利用技术。健全的宏观经济政策也可能有助于提高银行的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信