A Concept for Overhead Transmission Line Performance Evaluation toward Lightning Strikes

B. Harsono, P. Pramana, Sriyono
{"title":"A Concept for Overhead Transmission Line Performance Evaluation toward Lightning Strikes","authors":"B. Harsono, P. Pramana, Sriyono","doi":"10.1109/ICT-PEP57242.2022.9988774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the historical data, most overhead transmission line (OHL) fault was caused by lightning strikes. However, the evaluation of OHL performance toward lightning strikes in PT PLN (Persero) was commonly performed by gathering the number of recorded faults without any value as a reference. This paper explains a concept for OHL performance evaluation toward lightning using the Total Outage Rate (TOR) method. TOR value was obtained by calculating the probability of flashover (shielding failure flashover/SFFOR and back flashover/BFOR) based on OHL design data and lightning data. According to the analysis, the evaluated 150 kV OHL historical fault was 3.26 fault/year/100 km which is lower than the calculated TOR (6.01 flashover/year/100 km). Therefore, this OHL doesn't need any improvement toward lightning performance (i.e., installing Transmission Line Arrester, unbalancing insulator). A brief framework of this evaluation method is presented as a reference for OHL sorting. The result of variation toward several parameters in OHL design showed that a higher value of tower footing resistance, a bigger shielding angle, and a lower value of the insulator's BIL give a higher TOR value.","PeriodicalId":163424,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Technology and Policy in Energy and Electric Power (ICT-PEP)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Technology and Policy in Energy and Electric Power (ICT-PEP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT-PEP57242.2022.9988774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the historical data, most overhead transmission line (OHL) fault was caused by lightning strikes. However, the evaluation of OHL performance toward lightning strikes in PT PLN (Persero) was commonly performed by gathering the number of recorded faults without any value as a reference. This paper explains a concept for OHL performance evaluation toward lightning using the Total Outage Rate (TOR) method. TOR value was obtained by calculating the probability of flashover (shielding failure flashover/SFFOR and back flashover/BFOR) based on OHL design data and lightning data. According to the analysis, the evaluated 150 kV OHL historical fault was 3.26 fault/year/100 km which is lower than the calculated TOR (6.01 flashover/year/100 km). Therefore, this OHL doesn't need any improvement toward lightning performance (i.e., installing Transmission Line Arrester, unbalancing insulator). A brief framework of this evaluation method is presented as a reference for OHL sorting. The result of variation toward several parameters in OHL design showed that a higher value of tower footing resistance, a bigger shielding angle, and a lower value of the insulator's BIL give a higher TOR value.
雷击下架空输电线路性能评估的概念
根据历史资料,架空输电线路的故障大多是由雷击引起的。然而,在PT PLN (Persero)中,OHL对雷击的性能评估通常是通过收集记录的故障数量来进行的,没有任何值作为参考。本文阐述了一种利用总中断率(TOR)方法对雷电作用下OHL性能进行评估的概念。TOR值是基于OHL设计数据和雷电数据计算闪络概率(屏蔽失效闪络/SFFOR和反闪络/BFOR)得到的。根据分析,150 kV OHL历史故障值为3.26次/年/100 km,低于计算的TOR值(6.01次/年/100 km)。因此,该OHL不需要对避雷性能进行任何改进(即安装传输线避雷器,不平衡绝缘子)。给出了该评价方法的简要框架,为OHL分类提供参考。OHL设计中多个参数的变化结果表明,塔基电阻值越大,屏蔽角越大,绝缘子BIL值越小,TOR值越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信