Automatic Test Generation to Improve Scrum for Safety Agile Methodology

M. Barbareschi, Salvatore Barone, V. Casola, Salvatore Della Torca, Daniele Lombardi
{"title":"Automatic Test Generation to Improve Scrum for Safety Agile Methodology","authors":"M. Barbareschi, Salvatore Barone, V. Casola, Salvatore Della Torca, Daniele Lombardi","doi":"10.1145/3600160.3605061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Continuous compliance and living traceability, i.e., assure the technical quality of the software during the incremental flow of the agile process and trace the requirements’ implementation at any time during the development cycle, are two of the most challenging aspects of adopting agile methodologies in the safety critical domain. This is even more true when either user requirements are unstable, the knowledge of the product to be delivered is not enough, or there is no clear interfaces between various hardware/software subsystems, as it may be in a research and development context. In order to reduce the overall cost of these activities, in this manuscript, we discuss benefits resulting from adopting a semi-automatic method to perform continuous compliance and living traceability. The method aims to finding inconsistency between artifacts produced at the end of each iteration by exploit automatic generation of unit tests and coverage metrics. We validated the applicability of the proposed methodology over a real case study from the railway domain, proving it can find inconsistency between several regulations-required artifacts, including the requirements specification, the architectural specification, test specifications and their implementation, and the software implementation.","PeriodicalId":107145,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3600160.3605061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuous compliance and living traceability, i.e., assure the technical quality of the software during the incremental flow of the agile process and trace the requirements’ implementation at any time during the development cycle, are two of the most challenging aspects of adopting agile methodologies in the safety critical domain. This is even more true when either user requirements are unstable, the knowledge of the product to be delivered is not enough, or there is no clear interfaces between various hardware/software subsystems, as it may be in a research and development context. In order to reduce the overall cost of these activities, in this manuscript, we discuss benefits resulting from adopting a semi-automatic method to perform continuous compliance and living traceability. The method aims to finding inconsistency between artifacts produced at the end of each iteration by exploit automatic generation of unit tests and coverage metrics. We validated the applicability of the proposed methodology over a real case study from the railway domain, proving it can find inconsistency between several regulations-required artifacts, including the requirements specification, the architectural specification, test specifications and their implementation, and the software implementation.
自动生成测试以改进Scrum安全敏捷方法
持续的遵从性和实时的可追溯性,即在敏捷过程的增量流中确保软件的技术质量,并在开发周期的任何时间跟踪需求的实现,是在安全关键领域中采用敏捷方法的两个最具挑战性的方面。当用户需求不稳定时,对要交付的产品的了解不够,或者在各种硬件/软件子系统之间没有明确的接口时,就像在研究和开发环境中一样,情况更是如此。为了减少这些活动的总体成本,在本文中,我们讨论了采用半自动方法来执行连续的遵从性和实时可追溯性所带来的好处。该方法旨在通过利用自动生成的单元测试和覆盖度量来发现在每次迭代结束时产生的工件之间的不一致性。我们通过一个来自铁路领域的真实案例研究验证了所建议的方法的适用性,证明它可以发现几个规则所需的工件之间的不一致,包括需求规范、体系结构规范、测试规范及其实现,以及软件实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信