Preparing Software Engineers for the 'Real World'

E. Yourdon
{"title":"Preparing Software Engineers for the 'Real World'","authors":"E. Yourdon","doi":"10.1109/CSEE.2002.995191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given, as follows. For years, veteran programmers and project managers in corporate IT departments have complained that universities teach software engineering material that is either obsolete, irrelevant, or far too theoretical in nature. And while academia might disagree with such criticisms, it would at least be useful to have some additional insights into the things that industry believes are important and relevant. This keynote presentation will focus on several of these \"competencies,\" which the academic community may or may not wish to incorporate into the software engineering curriculum. For example, a major area of discussion and debate in industry today involves the tradeoffs between \"light\", agile software processes versus \"heavy\" processes such as the ones associated with the SEI-CMM. Similarly, industry practitioners are constantly debating the relative merits of a \"zero-defect\" quality approach, versus a \"good-enough\" approach to design, coding, and even testing. And industry practitioners are finding that the best way to teach these concepts, within their own corporate classrooms, involves \"war-games\" based on realistic simulation models of software projects.","PeriodicalId":250569,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEE.2002.995191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Summary form only given, as follows. For years, veteran programmers and project managers in corporate IT departments have complained that universities teach software engineering material that is either obsolete, irrelevant, or far too theoretical in nature. And while academia might disagree with such criticisms, it would at least be useful to have some additional insights into the things that industry believes are important and relevant. This keynote presentation will focus on several of these "competencies," which the academic community may or may not wish to incorporate into the software engineering curriculum. For example, a major area of discussion and debate in industry today involves the tradeoffs between "light", agile software processes versus "heavy" processes such as the ones associated with the SEI-CMM. Similarly, industry practitioners are constantly debating the relative merits of a "zero-defect" quality approach, versus a "good-enough" approach to design, coding, and even testing. And industry practitioners are finding that the best way to teach these concepts, within their own corporate classrooms, involves "war-games" based on realistic simulation models of software projects.
让软件工程师为“现实世界”做好准备
仅给出摘要形式,如下。多年来,公司IT部门的资深程序员和项目经理一直抱怨大学教授的软件工程材料要么过时,要么不相关,要么本质上过于理论化。虽然学术界可能不同意这种批评,但至少对行业认为重要和相关的事情有一些额外的见解是有用的。这个主题演讲将集中于这些“能力”中的几个,学术团体可能希望也可能不希望将它们合并到软件工程课程中。例如,当今业界讨论和争论的一个主要领域涉及“轻”、敏捷软件过程与“重”过程(如与SEI-CMM相关的过程)之间的权衡。类似地,行业从业者也在不断地争论“零缺陷”质量方法与“足够好”的设计、编码甚至测试方法的相对优点。行业从业者发现,在他们自己的公司教室里,教授这些概念的最佳方式是基于软件项目的现实模拟模型的“战争游戏”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信