Cyberattacks as "state of exception" reconceptualizing cybersecurity from prevention to surviving and accommodating

Sebastian Knebel, Mario D. Schultz, Peter Seele
{"title":"Cyberattacks as \"state of exception\" reconceptualizing cybersecurity from prevention to surviving and accommodating","authors":"Sebastian Knebel, Mario D. Schultz, Peter Seele","doi":"10.1108/jices-01-2021-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to outline how destructive communication exemplified by ransomware cyberattacks destroys the process of organization, causes a “state of exception,” and thus constitutes organization. The authors build on Agamben's state of exception and translate it into communicative constitution of organization (CCO) theory.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA significant increase of cyberattacks have impacted organizations in recent times and laid organizations under siege. This conceptual research builds on illustrative cases chosen by positive deviance case selection (PDCS) of ransomware attacks.\n\n\nFindings\nCCO theory focuses mainly on ordering characteristics of communication. The authors aim to complement this view with a perspective on destructive communication that destroys the process of organization. Based on illustrative cases, the authors conceptualize a process model of destructive CCO.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe authors expand thoughts about a digital “corporate immune system” to question current offensive cybersecurity strategies of deterrence and promote resilience approaches instead.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nInformed by destructive communication of cyberattacks, this theory advancement supports arguments to include notions of disorder into CCO theory. Furthermore, the paper explains where disruptions like cyberattacks may trigger sensemaking and change to preserve stability. Finally, a novel definition of ‘destructive CCO’ is provided: Destructive Communication Constitutes Organization by disrupting and destroying its site and surface while triggering sensemaking and becoming part of sensemaking itself.\n","PeriodicalId":156416,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-01-2021-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to outline how destructive communication exemplified by ransomware cyberattacks destroys the process of organization, causes a “state of exception,” and thus constitutes organization. The authors build on Agamben's state of exception and translate it into communicative constitution of organization (CCO) theory. Design/methodology/approach A significant increase of cyberattacks have impacted organizations in recent times and laid organizations under siege. This conceptual research builds on illustrative cases chosen by positive deviance case selection (PDCS) of ransomware attacks. Findings CCO theory focuses mainly on ordering characteristics of communication. The authors aim to complement this view with a perspective on destructive communication that destroys the process of organization. Based on illustrative cases, the authors conceptualize a process model of destructive CCO. Practical implications The authors expand thoughts about a digital “corporate immune system” to question current offensive cybersecurity strategies of deterrence and promote resilience approaches instead. Originality/value Informed by destructive communication of cyberattacks, this theory advancement supports arguments to include notions of disorder into CCO theory. Furthermore, the paper explains where disruptions like cyberattacks may trigger sensemaking and change to preserve stability. Finally, a novel definition of ‘destructive CCO’ is provided: Destructive Communication Constitutes Organization by disrupting and destroying its site and surface while triggering sensemaking and becoming part of sensemaking itself.
网络攻击作为“例外状态”重新定义了网络安全从预防到生存和适应的概念
本文旨在概述以勒索软件网络攻击为例的破坏性通信如何破坏组织的过程,导致“例外状态”,从而构成组织。作者以阿甘本的例外状态理论为基础,将其转化为组织的交际构成理论。设计/方法/方法近年来,网络攻击的显著增加影响了组织,使组织陷入困境。本概念性研究建立在勒索软件攻击的正向偏差案例选择(PDCS)选择的说明案例之上。scco理论主要关注沟通的有序特征。作者的目的是补充这一观点与破坏性的沟通,破坏组织的过程的观点。基于实例,提出了破坏性CCO的过程模型。实际意义:作者扩展了对数字“企业免疫系统”的思考,质疑当前的进攻性网络安全威慑战略,转而提倡弹性方法。原创性/价值通过破坏性的网络攻击传播,这一理论进步支持了将无序概念纳入CCO理论的论点。此外,该论文还解释了网络攻击等破坏可能引发意义生成和改变以保持稳定的地方。最后,给出了“破坏性CCO”的新定义:破坏性传播通过破坏和破坏组织的场所和表面,同时触发意义制造,并成为意义制造本身的一部分,从而构成组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信