Man v/s computer: Difference of the essences the problem of the scientific creation

T. Kalanov
{"title":"Man v/s computer: Difference of the essences the problem of the scientific creation","authors":"T. Kalanov","doi":"10.15520/IJCRR/2016/7/12/11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The critical analysis of the problem of creation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is proposed. The unity of formal logic and of rational dialectics is the methodological basis of the analysis. The main results of the analysis are as follows: (1) the model of man represents the unity of the two material aspects: “physiological body” (controllable aspect) and “psychical body” (controlling aspect); (2) the “psychical body” is the subsystem “subconsciousness + consciousness”; (3) in the comprehensive sense of the word, the thinking is an attribute of the complete system “physiological body + psychical body + environment”. (3) in the broad sense of the word, thinking and creativity are an essential feature of the subsystem “subconsciousness + consciousness”; (4) in the narrow (concise) sense of the word, thinking and creativity are the attribute of the instinct of the conservation (preservation, retention, maintenance) of life (i.e., the self-preservation instinct, the survival instinct); the instinct of the conservation of life exists in subconsciousness; (5) the instinct of the conservation of life is a system of elementary (basic) instincts; thinking is the attribute of the each elementary instinct; (6) the mechanism of thinking and the essence of creation cannot be cognized by man; (7) a computer as a device cannot think and create (in particular, it cannot prove theorems) because a computer does not have the subconsciousness; (8) the modeling of human thinking, Human Intellect, and the creation of AI and AGI are the impossible because the essential properties of the complete system “man + environment” cannot be cognized and modeled; (9) the existence of AI and AGI conflicts with the essence of the thinking; (10) the existence of AI and AGI contradict to formal-logical and rational-dialectical laws. Keywords: human intellect, artificial intelligence, artificial general intelligence, artificial psychology, computer science, psychology, linguistics, mathematics, P versus NP problem, Millennium Problems (Clay Mathematics Institute), formal logic, dialectics, philosophy, metaphysics.","PeriodicalId":426990,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Multidisciplinary Education and Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Multidisciplinary Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15520/IJCRR/2016/7/12/11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The critical analysis of the problem of creation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is proposed. The unity of formal logic and of rational dialectics is the methodological basis of the analysis. The main results of the analysis are as follows: (1) the model of man represents the unity of the two material aspects: “physiological body” (controllable aspect) and “psychical body” (controlling aspect); (2) the “psychical body” is the subsystem “subconsciousness + consciousness”; (3) in the comprehensive sense of the word, the thinking is an attribute of the complete system “physiological body + psychical body + environment”. (3) in the broad sense of the word, thinking and creativity are an essential feature of the subsystem “subconsciousness + consciousness”; (4) in the narrow (concise) sense of the word, thinking and creativity are the attribute of the instinct of the conservation (preservation, retention, maintenance) of life (i.e., the self-preservation instinct, the survival instinct); the instinct of the conservation of life exists in subconsciousness; (5) the instinct of the conservation of life is a system of elementary (basic) instincts; thinking is the attribute of the each elementary instinct; (6) the mechanism of thinking and the essence of creation cannot be cognized by man; (7) a computer as a device cannot think and create (in particular, it cannot prove theorems) because a computer does not have the subconsciousness; (8) the modeling of human thinking, Human Intellect, and the creation of AI and AGI are the impossible because the essential properties of the complete system “man + environment” cannot be cognized and modeled; (9) the existence of AI and AGI conflicts with the essence of the thinking; (10) the existence of AI and AGI contradict to formal-logical and rational-dialectical laws. Keywords: human intellect, artificial intelligence, artificial general intelligence, artificial psychology, computer science, psychology, linguistics, mathematics, P versus NP problem, Millennium Problems (Clay Mathematics Institute), formal logic, dialectics, philosophy, metaphysics.
人与计算机:科学创造的本质差异问题
对人工智能(AI)和通用人工智能(AGI)的创造问题进行了批判性分析。形式逻辑和理性辩证法的统一是分析的方法论基础。分析的主要结果如下:(1)人的模式代表了“生理体”(可控方面)和“精神体”(控制方面)两个物质方面的统一;(2)“心理体”是“潜意识+意识”的子系统;(3)从广义上讲,思维是“生理体+心理体+环境”这一完整系统的一个属性。(3)从广义上讲,思维和创造力是“潜意识+意识”子系统的本质特征;(4)从狭义(简明)的意义上说,思维和创造是保存(保存、保留、维持)生命本能(即自我保存本能、生存本能)的属性;保护生命的本能存在于潜意识中;(5)保护生命的本能是一套初级(基本)本能;思维是每一种基本本能的属性;(6)人不能认识思维的机制和创造的本质;(7)计算机作为一种设备不能思考和创造(特别是不能证明定理),因为计算机没有潜意识;(8)人类思维、人类智力的建模以及人工智能和AGI的创建是不可能的,因为完整系统“人+环境”的基本属性无法被认知和建模;(9) AI和AGI的存在与思维的本质相冲突;(10)人工智能和AGI的存在与形式逻辑规律和理性辩证规律相矛盾。关键词:人类智能、人工智能、人工通用智能、人工心理学、计算机科学、心理学、语言学、数学、P对NP问题、千年问题(克莱数学研究所)、形式逻辑、辩证法、哲学、形而上学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信