Naturalness of Quercus robur stands in Latvia, estimated by structure, species, and processes

Sandra Ikauniece
{"title":"Naturalness of Quercus robur stands in Latvia, estimated by structure, species, and processes","authors":"Sandra Ikauniece","doi":"10.3176/ECO.2012.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In seven Quercus robur stands in Latvia, the past history of stand development was determined by size and age structure of trees, dead wood amounts, cut stumps, and by forest inventory records and maps. All the stands met the criteria of Woodland Key Habitats. Quercus robur was the main canopy species in all stands. Since the time of the recruitment of canopy trees, there has been minimal release of the Q. robur in the > 1-m height class, at least among those that have survived until today. One stand lacked evidence of natural successional processes, while the others were naturally regenerating with Picea abies or deciduous tree species, such as Fraxinus excelsior, Ulmus glabra, Alnus glutinosa, and Tilia cordata. The dead wood amounts in plots suggest a high level of naturalness. However, the ages of the canopy oaks (up to 226 years) indicate lack of long-term natural development. Also, the presence of cut stumps in three plots and lack of standing dead wood in four plots are signs of the impact of human disturbance on natural processes. Since the 1920s, one of the stands had converted from a Populus tremula and Betula pendula to a Q. robur canopy. Even though the studied stands can be considered as having low naturalness based on age structure and past management history, they each supported two to eight Woodland Key Habitat indicator species, including one to six protected species.","PeriodicalId":262667,"journal":{"name":"Estonian Journal of Ecology","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estonian Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/ECO.2012.1.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In seven Quercus robur stands in Latvia, the past history of stand development was determined by size and age structure of trees, dead wood amounts, cut stumps, and by forest inventory records and maps. All the stands met the criteria of Woodland Key Habitats. Quercus robur was the main canopy species in all stands. Since the time of the recruitment of canopy trees, there has been minimal release of the Q. robur in the > 1-m height class, at least among those that have survived until today. One stand lacked evidence of natural successional processes, while the others were naturally regenerating with Picea abies or deciduous tree species, such as Fraxinus excelsior, Ulmus glabra, Alnus glutinosa, and Tilia cordata. The dead wood amounts in plots suggest a high level of naturalness. However, the ages of the canopy oaks (up to 226 years) indicate lack of long-term natural development. Also, the presence of cut stumps in three plots and lack of standing dead wood in four plots are signs of the impact of human disturbance on natural processes. Since the 1920s, one of the stands had converted from a Populus tremula and Betula pendula to a Q. robur canopy. Even though the studied stands can be considered as having low naturalness based on age structure and past management history, they each supported two to eight Woodland Key Habitat indicator species, including one to six protected species.
拉脱维亚栎林的自然度,按结构、种类和过程估计
在拉脱维亚的7个栎树林分中,过去的林分发展历史由树木的大小和年龄结构、枯木量、砍伐的树桩以及森林清查记录和地图决定。所有林分均符合林地重点生境标准。栎树是各林分的主要林冠种。自冠层树木招募以来,在> 1 m高度类别中,至少在那些幸存至今的树木中,已经有最小的释放。其中一个林分缺乏自然演替过程的证据,而其他林分则以云杉或落叶树种(如黄曲霉、秃榆、桤木和天麻)自然再生。样地的枯木数量表明自然程度高。然而,树冠栎的树龄(高达226年)表明缺乏长期的自然发展。另外,3个样地出现了被砍的树桩,4个样地没有枯木,这是人类干扰对自然过程影响的迹象。自20世纪20年代以来,其中一个林分已经从白杨和白桦转变为刺柏树冠。尽管从林龄结构和过去的管理历史来看,所研究的林分自然度较低,但每个林分都支持2至8种林地关键生境指示物种,其中包括1至6种受保护物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信