Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Immunochromatographic Rapid Card Test for Malarial Antigen against Peripheral Smear Microscopy: A Cross-sectional Study

A. Mehta, Vijay Singh, A. Borle
{"title":"Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Immunochromatographic Rapid Card Test for Malarial Antigen against Peripheral Smear Microscopy: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"A. Mehta, Vijay Singh, A. Borle","doi":"10.9734/bpi/rpmb/v6/2349f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Malaria poses a major public health problem in India and has emerged as a biggest health burden in terms of morbidity and mortality. Rapid detection of malarial parasite can ensure the prompt timely and efficient management of clinical cases and control of the disease. In India Peripheral smear microscopy still exists as the most commonly employed method for diagnosing malaria. \nObjectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Immunochromatographic Rapid Card Test (ICT) for malarial antigen against Peripheral smear microscopy for diagnosing Malaria. \nMaterials and Methods: This Cross sectional study was conducted in Dept. of Microbiology of a Rural tertiary care teaching hospital of Western Uttar Pradesh from January 2016 to August 2016. \nEight Hundred thirty seven patients with clinical suspicion of malaria whose samples were sent on advice by clinicians to the Microbiology laboratory for the peripheral smear microscopy and Rapid card test for malarial antigen were included in this study after obtaining clearance from Institutional Ethics committee. \nResults: Out of the 837 blood samples tested ,106 (12.66%) samples tested positive for malaria by Peripheral smear microscopy and 109(13%) by ICT Rapid card tests. The sensitivity of ICT for non-falciparum malaria came out to be 82.65% lower than that for falciparum malaria(87.5%). The specificity of ICT for non. falciparum malaria(98.9%) was almost same as for falciparum malaria (99.3%).The accuracy of ICT for falciparum malaria(99.16%) was slightly higher than for non-falciparum malaria(97%). \nConclusion: This study suggests that ICT Rapid card test can not replace PS microscopy completely, but can be used as a complementary tool to microscopy, particularly in resource constrained remote rural areas of India.","PeriodicalId":226212,"journal":{"name":"Recent Progress in Microbiology and Biotechnology Vol. 6","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent Progress in Microbiology and Biotechnology Vol. 6","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/rpmb/v6/2349f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malaria poses a major public health problem in India and has emerged as a biggest health burden in terms of morbidity and mortality. Rapid detection of malarial parasite can ensure the prompt timely and efficient management of clinical cases and control of the disease. In India Peripheral smear microscopy still exists as the most commonly employed method for diagnosing malaria. Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Immunochromatographic Rapid Card Test (ICT) for malarial antigen against Peripheral smear microscopy for diagnosing Malaria. Materials and Methods: This Cross sectional study was conducted in Dept. of Microbiology of a Rural tertiary care teaching hospital of Western Uttar Pradesh from January 2016 to August 2016. Eight Hundred thirty seven patients with clinical suspicion of malaria whose samples were sent on advice by clinicians to the Microbiology laboratory for the peripheral smear microscopy and Rapid card test for malarial antigen were included in this study after obtaining clearance from Institutional Ethics committee. Results: Out of the 837 blood samples tested ,106 (12.66%) samples tested positive for malaria by Peripheral smear microscopy and 109(13%) by ICT Rapid card tests. The sensitivity of ICT for non-falciparum malaria came out to be 82.65% lower than that for falciparum malaria(87.5%). The specificity of ICT for non. falciparum malaria(98.9%) was almost same as for falciparum malaria (99.3%).The accuracy of ICT for falciparum malaria(99.16%) was slightly higher than for non-falciparum malaria(97%). Conclusion: This study suggests that ICT Rapid card test can not replace PS microscopy completely, but can be used as a complementary tool to microscopy, particularly in resource constrained remote rural areas of India.
免疫层析快速卡检测疟疾抗原对外周涂片镜检诊断性能的评价:一项横断面研究
背景:疟疾是印度的一个主要公共卫生问题,在发病率和死亡率方面已成为最大的健康负担。疟疾寄生虫的快速检测可以确保及时有效地管理临床病例和控制该病。在印度,外周涂片镜检仍然是诊断疟疾最常用的方法。目的:评价免疫层析快速卡片试验(ICT)对外周涂片镜检疟疾的诊断价值。材料与方法:本横断面研究于2016年1月至2016年8月在西北方邦农村三级保健教学医院微生物科进行。837例临床疑似疟疾患者的样本经临床医生建议送至微生物实验室进行外周涂片镜检和疟疾抗原快速卡试验,经机构伦理委员会批准后纳入本研究。结果:在检测的837份血样中,106份(12.66%)经外周涂片镜检呈疟疾阳性,109份(13%)经ICT快速卡片检测呈阳性。ICT对非恶性疟疾的敏感性比恶性疟疾(87.5%)低82.65%。ICT对非的特异性。恶性疟(98.9%)与恶性疟(99.3%)基本相同。ICT诊断恶性疟疾的准确率(99.16%)略高于非恶性疟疾的准确率(97%)。结论:本研究提示ICT快速卡片测试不能完全取代PS显微镜,但可以作为显微镜的补充工具,特别是在资源有限的印度偏远农村地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信