MISDEMEANOR: NEW CHALLENGES OF DEFINITION INTERPRETATION

Ivan Krasnytskyi, G. Yaremko
{"title":"MISDEMEANOR: NEW CHALLENGES OF DEFINITION INTERPRETATION","authors":"Ivan Krasnytskyi, G. Yaremko","doi":"10.32518/2617-4162-2020-4-49-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is dedicated to the issue of misdemeanor term content and the scope determination, and its differentiation from a crime. This issue arises from the use in the Criminal Code of Ukraine of the regulatory construction �the other punishment not related to the liberty deprivation� when defining the term of a misdemeanor. Such legislative definition can have double interpretation: either as other, more lenient than liberty deprivation for a particular period, types of punishment or as other types of punishment, but for those, that according to their content, also mean liberty deprivation (isolation from society) � imprisonment, confinement in disciplinary military unit, liberty deprivation for a particular period, or life sentence. Purpose. The purpose of this article is not to question language or technical and legislative means used for the formulation of the misdemeanor definition, but a significant law-application issue the solution of which will directly affect criminal-material and procedural consequences connected with reference of a criminal offense to the category of a misdemeanor or minor offense. Results. This article gives reasons why the regulatory construction �crimes not related to the liberty deprivation� should be interpreted as other types of punishment but for imprisonment, confinement in disciplinary military unit, liberty deprivation for a particular period, or life sentence. Another approach, which is to interpret the corresponding regulatory provision as any type of punishment different to liberty deprivation for a particular period or life sentence, is rather a forced one, but not well-grounded. Conclusion. There are enough of scientific and regulatory grounds for understanding of the used in part 2 article 12 of the CC of Ukraine definition �punishment not related to the liberty deprivation� as the corresponding list of punishment types listed in part 1 article 51 of the CC of Ukraine, but for the punishment in the way of imprisonment, confinement in disciplinary military unit, liberty deprivation for a particular period, or life sentence. Arguing that the corresponding definition should be interpreted as any type of punishment other than liberty deprivation for a particular period and life sentence is rather a forced position but not well-grounded.","PeriodicalId":344341,"journal":{"name":"Social Legal Studios","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Legal Studios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2020-4-49-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is dedicated to the issue of misdemeanor term content and the scope determination, and its differentiation from a crime. This issue arises from the use in the Criminal Code of Ukraine of the regulatory construction �the other punishment not related to the liberty deprivation� when defining the term of a misdemeanor. Such legislative definition can have double interpretation: either as other, more lenient than liberty deprivation for a particular period, types of punishment or as other types of punishment, but for those, that according to their content, also mean liberty deprivation (isolation from society) � imprisonment, confinement in disciplinary military unit, liberty deprivation for a particular period, or life sentence. Purpose. The purpose of this article is not to question language or technical and legislative means used for the formulation of the misdemeanor definition, but a significant law-application issue the solution of which will directly affect criminal-material and procedural consequences connected with reference of a criminal offense to the category of a misdemeanor or minor offense. Results. This article gives reasons why the regulatory construction �crimes not related to the liberty deprivation� should be interpreted as other types of punishment but for imprisonment, confinement in disciplinary military unit, liberty deprivation for a particular period, or life sentence. Another approach, which is to interpret the corresponding regulatory provision as any type of punishment different to liberty deprivation for a particular period or life sentence, is rather a forced one, but not well-grounded. Conclusion. There are enough of scientific and regulatory grounds for understanding of the used in part 2 article 12 of the CC of Ukraine definition �punishment not related to the liberty deprivation� as the corresponding list of punishment types listed in part 1 article 51 of the CC of Ukraine, but for the punishment in the way of imprisonment, confinement in disciplinary military unit, liberty deprivation for a particular period, or life sentence. Arguing that the corresponding definition should be interpreted as any type of punishment other than liberty deprivation for a particular period and life sentence is rather a forced position but not well-grounded.
轻罪:定义解释的新挑战
本文就轻罪罪名的内容、范围的确定以及轻罪与犯罪的区别问题进行了探讨。这一问题是由于乌克兰《刑法》在定义轻罪一词时使用了“与剥夺自由无关的其他惩罚”这一管制性解释。这种立法定义可以有双重解释:要么作为其他,比在特定时期内剥夺自由更轻的惩罚类型,要么作为其他类型的惩罚,但对于那些根据其内容也意味着剥夺自由(与社会隔离)的惩罚类型——监禁、纪律严明的军事单位监禁、在特定时期内剥夺自由或无期徒刑。目的。本文的目的不是质疑为制定轻罪定义所使用的语言或技术和立法手段,而是一个重大的法律适用问题,该问题的解决将直接影响到与将刑事犯罪归入轻罪或轻罪类别有关的刑事物质和程序后果。结果。本文阐述了“与剥夺自由无关的犯罪”这一规制结构应解释为监禁、纪律部队监禁、特定时期剥夺自由或无期徒刑以外的其他刑罚的理由。另一种做法是将相应的监管规定解释为不同于在特定时期内剥夺自由或无期徒刑的任何一种惩罚,这是一种强制性的做法,但没有充分的根据。结论。有足够的科学和法规依据来理解乌克兰CC第2部分第12条所使用的定义“与剥夺自由无关的惩罚”作为乌克兰CC第51条第1部分所列出的惩罚类型的相应列表,而是以监禁,纪律军事单位监禁,特定时期剥夺自由或无期徒刑的方式进行的惩罚。认为相应的定义应解释为特定时期剥夺自由和无期徒刑以外的任何类型的惩罚,这是一种勉强的立场,但没有充分根据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信