A Randomized, Double Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Palonosetron with Dexamethasone Versus Palonosetron Alone for Prevention of Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting in Subjects Undergoing Bariatric Surgeries with High Emetogenic Risk

S. Didehvar, J. D. Viola-Blitz, M. Haile, Lola Franco, R. Kline, M. Kurian, G. Fielding, C. Ren, A. Bekker
{"title":"A Randomized, Double Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Palonosetron with Dexamethasone Versus Palonosetron Alone for Prevention of Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting in Subjects Undergoing Bariatric Surgeries with High Emetogenic Risk","authors":"S. Didehvar, J. D. Viola-Blitz, M. Haile, Lola Franco, R. Kline, M. Kurian, G. Fielding, C. Ren, A. Bekker","doi":"10.2174/1874321801307010030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Postoperative (PONV) and postdischarge (PDNV) nausea and vomiting are common (60-70%) after bariatric surgery. Palonosetron (Pal), a novel 5-HT3 antagonist, is an effective antiemetic with a prolonged duration of action in the setting of PDNV. We hypothesized that combination therapy with Palonosetron (Pal) and dexamethasone (Dex) would improve treatment in comparison to Palonosetron alone in patients at high risk for PONV. Methods: In this study, patients undergoing bariatric laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia, a subgroup of a larger Phase IV clinical trial of patients who had laparoscopic surgery, were randomized to 8 mg Dex + 0.075mg Pal or saline + 0.075mg Pal. Data was collected postoperatively at 2, 6, 24 and 72 hrs. A Functional Living Index-Emesis (QOL-FLIE) test was administered at 96 hrs. Results: We enrolled 76 ASA 1-2 patients with at least 3 PONV risk factors. Both randomization groups had a low inci- dence of vomiting in the PACU (Pal, 0.0%; Pal + Dex, 5.4%) as well as at 72 hours (0.0% both groups). Complete re- sponse (no vomiting, no rescue medication) was not different between treatment groups at any time intervals. Cumulative success rates over the entire 72 hrs were 60.4% (Pal alone) vs. 60.0% (Pal + Dex). Nausea scores (4 point ordinal scale) were not different between groups for any time intervals. Cumulative success scores for nausea (score = \"none\"; 0-72 hrs) were 41.9% for the Pal group, and 55.2% for the Pal+ Dex group. The Pal + Dex group showed a trend toward greater sat- isfaction on the QOL-FLIE scores with the greatest differences in the \"nausea domain\". Discussion: The combination therapy (Pal + Dex) did not significantly reduce the incidence of PONV or PDNV when compared with Pal alone although a trend was observed indicating the possible increased efficacy of multi-drug therapy. There was no change in comparative efficacy over 72 hrs, possibly due to the low incidence of PDNV in both groups.","PeriodicalId":272376,"journal":{"name":"The Open Anesthesiology Journal","volume":"191 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Anesthesiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874321801307010030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative (PONV) and postdischarge (PDNV) nausea and vomiting are common (60-70%) after bariatric surgery. Palonosetron (Pal), a novel 5-HT3 antagonist, is an effective antiemetic with a prolonged duration of action in the setting of PDNV. We hypothesized that combination therapy with Palonosetron (Pal) and dexamethasone (Dex) would improve treatment in comparison to Palonosetron alone in patients at high risk for PONV. Methods: In this study, patients undergoing bariatric laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia, a subgroup of a larger Phase IV clinical trial of patients who had laparoscopic surgery, were randomized to 8 mg Dex + 0.075mg Pal or saline + 0.075mg Pal. Data was collected postoperatively at 2, 6, 24 and 72 hrs. A Functional Living Index-Emesis (QOL-FLIE) test was administered at 96 hrs. Results: We enrolled 76 ASA 1-2 patients with at least 3 PONV risk factors. Both randomization groups had a low inci- dence of vomiting in the PACU (Pal, 0.0%; Pal + Dex, 5.4%) as well as at 72 hours (0.0% both groups). Complete re- sponse (no vomiting, no rescue medication) was not different between treatment groups at any time intervals. Cumulative success rates over the entire 72 hrs were 60.4% (Pal alone) vs. 60.0% (Pal + Dex). Nausea scores (4 point ordinal scale) were not different between groups for any time intervals. Cumulative success scores for nausea (score = "none"; 0-72 hrs) were 41.9% for the Pal group, and 55.2% for the Pal+ Dex group. The Pal + Dex group showed a trend toward greater sat- isfaction on the QOL-FLIE scores with the greatest differences in the "nausea domain". Discussion: The combination therapy (Pal + Dex) did not significantly reduce the incidence of PONV or PDNV when compared with Pal alone although a trend was observed indicating the possible increased efficacy of multi-drug therapy. There was no change in comparative efficacy over 72 hrs, possibly due to the low incidence of PDNV in both groups.
一项随机、双盲研究,评估帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松与帕洛诺司琼单用预防高致吐风险减肥手术患者术后恶心和呕吐的疗效
术后(PONV)和出院后(PDNV)恶心和呕吐是减肥手术后常见的(60-70%)。帕洛诺司琼(Pal)是一种新型的5-HT3拮抗剂,是一种有效的止吐药,在PDNV的情况下作用时间延长。我们假设帕洛诺司琼(Pal)和地塞米松(Dex)联合治疗对PONV高风险患者的治疗效果比单独使用帕洛诺司琼更好。方法:在这项研究中,在全麻下接受减肥腹腔镜手术的患者,作为更大的腹腔镜手术患者IV期临床试验的一个亚组,被随机分配到8 mg Dex + 0.075mg Pal或生理盐水+ 0.075mg Pal,在术后2、6、24和72小时收集数据。96小时进行功能生活指数-呕吐(qol - fly)测试。结果:我们纳入了76例ASA 1-2患者,至少有3个PONV危险因素。两个随机分组的PACU呕吐发生率均较低(Pal, 0.0%;Pal + Dex, 5.4%)和72小时时(两组均为0.0%)。完全缓解(无呕吐,无抢救用药)在任何时间间隔内各组之间没有差异。整个72小时的累计成功率分别为60.4% (Pal单独)和60.0% (Pal + Dex)。恶心评分(4分序数)各组间在任何时间间隔内均无差异。恶心的累计成功评分(score = "none";Pal组为41.9%,Pal+ Dex组为55.2%。Pal + Dex组在qol - fly评分上表现出更高的满意度,在“恶心域”上差异最大。讨论:与单用Pal相比,联合治疗(Pal + Dex)并没有显著降低PONV或PDNV的发生率,尽管观察到一种趋势表明多药治疗可能提高疗效。在72小时内,比较疗效没有变化,可能是由于两组的PDNV发病率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信